Peer review declaration

Abstract

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Single-blind peer review• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? The reviewers provide their constructive & detailed comments and suggestions on the manuscripts via the conference peer review system. The Authors were asked to revise their original manuscripts in alignment with the reviewers’ comments and suggestions for publication. An opportunity will be given to the authors to resubmit their manuscripts after revisions.• Conference submission management system: http://www.academicconf.com/Identity/Account/Login?confName=cmse2021• Number of submissions received: 185 (include abstracts and full papers)• Number of submissions sent for review: 85 (full papers)• Number of submissions accepted: 34 (full papers)• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 40.0%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: About 160• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): The conference uses iThenticate to check plagiarism. All papers were checked once submitted and were checked again before they are sent to the Publisher for publication.• Contact person for queries: Guest editor:Dr. Alexander Khotsianovskyalexyanovsky9@gmail.comManaging Editor of Strength of MaterialsPisarenko Institute of Problems of Strength of the National Academy of Sciences ofUkraine, Ukraine