Abstract

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:• Type of peer review: Double-blindAuthor’s information were removed from the papers before be forwarded to the reviewers. And the authors only got the comments of papers without reviewers’ information.• Conference submission management system: http://papersub.pmsconf.org/ • Number of submissions received:126• Number of submissions sent for review:118• Number of submissions accepted:68• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Approximately 57.1%• Average number of reviews per paper:3• Total number of reviewers involved:337• Any additional info on review process:After preview by editorial assistant, 118 papers were sent for peer reviews, 337 reviewers were involved in the process, and review process for each paper took around 1 month. The decision to accept or reject was based on the reviewers’ comments. If differences of opinion occurred between reviewers, the editors weighed all comments and arrived at a balanced decision based on all comments, or a second round of peer review was initiated.• Contact person for queries:Ms. Lily Gong, secretary@pmsconf.org

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call