Peer review declaration

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: We conduct paper submission through open conference system (http://conference.unhas.ac.id/ocs/index.php/bctb/2021/login) and the manuscript from author has submitted before the conference through the conference website (https://bctb.unhas.ac.id/) • Number of submissions received: Total received abstract = 251 titles • Number of submissions sent for review: 231 titles for abstract • Number of submissions accepted: 138 titles of fullpaper from 231 titles of fullpaper submitted • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59.7 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 7- 8 papers per reviewer • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: There are some steps on review process1. review and acceptanceAt the begin, the abstract is submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page. The submitted abstracts are then collected by the committee for review one by one regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The abstract review was carried out by an internal reviewer. If there are any discrepancies, the abstract will be sent back to participants via email.2. Submission of Full PaperSecondly, uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. This upload and revision activity was carried out on July 25 - September 15 20213. Revision of Full PaperAt the revision stage, participants will be requested to make revisions based on the input given by the reviewer, this input is generally in the form of format, language and continuity of each discussion.4. Peer review of Full PaperAt the Fourth stage, full paper previously submitted through system were reviewed following a single blind peer review process. The papers were sent to reviewer that consisted of 18 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Review was conducted on content, language, and format of the paper based on IOP Conference Series. At this stage, Reviewer submit a decision for the acceptance of the papers for publication in IOP Conference Series.5. Revision of Reviewed Full PaperAs the end, the submitted papers were then subjected to proofread stage and check for similarity using Turnitin program. Subsequently, papers were prepared for submission to IOP Conference Series. • Contact person: Mukrimin MukriminDepartment of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesiamukrimin@unhas.ac.id