Peer review declaration

Abstract

Buildintech Bit 2020. Innovations and Technologies in Construction All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind. Both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.• Conference submission management system: Papers are submitted through the site. Every participant in the conference served by this site, “in any capacity,” must maintain a login and password. The same login must be used for all conferences. Follow the link to register a login, to check and update your personal information, or to retrieve your password. To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation, the first time when you login to a new account, you will be directed to the required opt-in consent form before you can use your account in any capacity for products and services offered through this site. All papers submitted to the conferences supported by this site need to be prepared as compliant PDF files and must be formatted according to the template.• Number of submissions received: 205 • Number of submissions sent for review: 205 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 41 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 80 • Any additional info on review process: All papers submitted to the «Modern Scientist» journal pass the procedure of reviewing according to the order established by editorial board. Members of the editorial board and leading Russian and international experts in corresponding areas of life sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. Conference Editors choose readers for peer review. In the case of the manuscript relevance to the conference profile, established rules and requirements, it is accepted by the editorial board and is sent for the reviewing. Otherwise the article is rejected without further reviewing. Reviewers prepare reviews of articles on a voluntary basis. Reviewers should submit their reviews in a scanned form. The reviewer makes a conclusion about the possibility of publishing an article:• “recommended for publication”;• “recommended taking into account the correction of the comments made by the reviewer”;• “article must be sent for revision”;• “not recommended for publication”.The articles are reviewed and accepted only after at least two positive reviews of three reviewers. After making a decision by the editorial board of the conference to admit the article for publication, the author is informed about it.• Contact person for queries: Klyuyev Sergey <klyuyev@yandex.ru>