Abstract

Chemical soil analysis data can be expressed by weight (i.e., gravimetric basis) or volume (i.e., volumetric basis) of the fine earth (sieved ≥2 mm), resulting in different units, cmolc kg-1 and cmolc dm-3, respectively. The research problem is that the difference between methods to express the same soil properties hinders the comparison of results and database or dataset standardization. This paper aims to develop pedotransfer functions (PTF) to obtain the density of fine earth, which will then be used [...]

Highlights

  • The majority of soil chemical and physical analyses start with the preparation of samples in the laboratory, through drying and maceration, followed by sieving (≥2 mm) to obtain the called fine earth (Teixeira et al, 2017)

  • This paper aims to develop pedotransfer functions (PTF) to obtain the density of fine earth, which will be used for conversion data expressed in volumetric to gravimetric basis, or vice versa, that will be applied to compare results and to standardize databases with different units

  • The dataset used for the development of Pedotransfer Function 2 (PTF2) has some low clay contents, which can lead to high-density predictions, so it is recommended to use it with caution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of soil chemical and physical analyses start with the preparation of samples in the laboratory, through drying and maceration, followed by sieving (≥2 mm) to obtain the called fine earth (Teixeira et al, 2017). The most common procedure to evaluate soil fertility in Brazil and countries such as the U.S.A., is to sample volumetrically the fine earth by using a device that consists of a small cylinder with a 10 cm volume (Silva et al, 2009; Soil Survey Staff, 2014a). This device gives convenience and speed in the process of sample preparation for chemical analysis. Details about the chemical properties for soil classification and chemical analyses units are presented in the publications IUSS Working Group (2015), Santos et al (2018), Soil Survey Staff (2014b), Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual (Soil Survey Staff, 2014a), and the Manual for soil and water analysis (Buurman et al, 1996)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.