Pedicled compared with free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in breast reconstruction.

Abstract

Two groups of patients who had undergone breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap after modified radical or partial mastectomy were evaluated. The type of reconstruction was either pedicled (n = 27, one of which bilateral) or free flap transfer (n = 11). In both groups there were both primary and secondary reconstructions. Flap complications were more common with the pedicled TRAM flap. There were nine partial flap necroses in the pedicle group, but only one in the free flap group. The only flap loss was a pedicled flap. In the free flap group, revision of the anastomosis was required in two patients. The free TRAM flap took longer to do than the pedicled flap. In conclusion, the two procedures yield acceptable results, but the free TRAM flap seems to be safer than the pedicled flap, thanks to the better blood supply from the inferior epigastric artery. It also allows greater freedom and versatility in moulding the reconstructed breast.