Pediatrics in Review: A Reflection of Our Profession

Abstract

1. Lawrence F. Nazarian, MD, Editor-in-Chief As I look back on 27 years of affiliation with Pediatrics in Review ( PIR ), it strikes me that much of what has evolved in the growth and development of the Journal mirrors what has been happening in the general realm of pediatrics. The complexion of our profession is different from what it was in 1985, when I first joined the editorial board, and that metamorphosis is paralleled by changes that have taken place in PIR . A much stronger emphasis on backing up our practice with evidence has swept through all of medicine. I like to think that we had always based our actions on solid findings; however, the intensity of this effort has increased mightily. Although the Journal is known for its practical philosophy, we have encouraged authors to give the readers the underlying evidence for their recommendations and to indicate the strength of that evidence. Articles have been written specifically on the topic of evaluating the literature and making intelligent judgments from studies. We have published a series on research and statistics, educating our readers about the specific procedures that determine validity and applicability of research data. Our series on complementary and holistic pediatrics presents in an objective fashion the studies that have been done of these alternative therapies, focusing on the evidence for efficacy and safety and putting each treatment into a proper perspective. All of society has been …