Pediatric patient-specific three-dimensional virtual models for surgical decision making in resection of hepatic and retroperitoneal tumors.

Abstract

Typically, preoperative imaging is viewed in two dimensions (2D) only, but three-dimensional (3D) virtual models may improve viewers' anatomical perspective by permitting them to interact with the imaging through manipulating it in space. Research into the utility of these models in most surgical specialties is growing rapidly. This study investigates the utility of 3D virtual models of complex pediatric abdominal tumors for clinical decision making, particularly the decision to proceed with surgical resection or not. 3D virtual models of tumors and adjacent anatomy were created from CT images of pediatric patients scanned for Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma or hepatoblastoma. Pediatric surgeons individually assessed the resectability of the tumors. First, they assessed resectability using the standard protocol of viewing imaging on conventional screens and then reassessed resectability after being presented with the 3D virtual models. Inter-physician agreement on resectability for each patient was analyzed using Krippendorff's alpha. Inter-physician agreement was used as a surrogate for correct interpretation. Participants were also surveyed afterward on the utility and practicality of the 3D virtual models for clinical decision making. Inter-physician agreement when using CT imaging alone was "fair" (Krippendorff's alpha α = 0.399), while inter-physician agreement when using 3D virtual models increased to "moderate" (Krippendorff's alpha α = 0.532). When surveyed about model utility, all 5 participants considered them helpful. Two participants felt the models would be practical for clinical use in most cases, while 3 felt they would be practical for select cases only. This study demonstrates the subjective utility of 3D virtual models of pediatric abdominal tumors for clinical decision making. The models are an adjunct that can be particularly useful in complicated tumors that efface or displace critical structures that may impact resectability. Statistical analysis demonstrates the improved inter-rater agreement with the 3D stereoscopic display over the 2D display. The use of 3D displays of medical images will increase over time, and evaluation of their potential usefulness in various clinical settings is necessary.