Pediatric Palliative Epilepsy Surgery: A Report From the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database

Background:Multimodal treatment approaches are often considered for patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Creating an algorithm that can guide healthcare providers in selecting treatment options for patients with LGS remains a challenge. Herein, we assessed the long-term seizure-free and neurodevelopmental outcomes of stepwise multimodal treatment in patients with LGS.Objective:Herein, we assess the long-term seizure-free and neurodevelopmental outcomes of stepwise multimodal treatment in patients with LGS.Methods:We retrospectively examined the data of 371 patients with LGS who underwent stepwise multimodal treatment, including antiseizure medication (ASM) therapy, dietary therapy (DT), resective epilepsy surgery (R-ES), and palliative epilepsy surgery (P-ES). The seizure-free outcome was considered to be the effect of the final treatment according to the treatment algorithm, and the percentage of patients who remained seizure-free in each treatment group was calculated. ASM treatment, DT, R-ES, and P-ES were applied to 371 (100%), 201 (54.2%), 112 (30.2%), and 115 (31.0%) patients with LGS, respectively. We evaluated the stepwise multimodal treatment outcomes in these patients.Results:One hundred sixty-eight patients (45.3%) remained seizure-free for at least 1 year (seizure-free-for-1-year group), 61 of whom (16.5%) remained seizure-free for more than 5 years (remained-seizure-free group). Among the patients treated with ASM therapy, DT, R-ES, and P-ES, 41 (11.1%), 53 (14.3%), 56 (15.1%), and 29 (7.8%), respectively, remained seizure-free for 1 year. In addition, 15 (4.1%), 15 (4.1%), 19 (5.1%), and 12 (3.2%) patients in the ASM, DT, R-ES, and P-ES treatment groups, respectively, remained seizure-free for more than 5 years. Both the seizure-free-for-1-year and remained-seizure-free groups showed significant improvement in electroencephalography findings and neurodevelopmental status following treatment.Conclusion:This study provides an update on the long-term seizure outcomes and neurodevelopmental improvements in a large cohort of patients with LGS following comprehensive multimodal treatment. We emphasize that the active combination of multiple ASMs, DT, and surgical treatment could provide long-term seizure-free outcomes and significant neurological benefits to patients with LGS.

Pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) are often referred for evaluation to consider epilepsy surgery. Neuropsychological testing is recommended for all patients undergoing surgical evaluation. Prevalence and factors affecting testing of neuropsychological testing in palliative epilepsy surgery are unknown. Data was collected from the PERC surgical database, a collaboration of pediatric epilepsy centers prospectively enrolling pediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation. Pediatric patients with DRE who sought care at PERC centers, underwent first-time palliative epilepsy surgery, and had neurocognitive data collected were included. 569 patients had complete data with some form of neuropsychological assessment documented. Patients with focal motor (0.42 [CI 95% 0.28, 0.62]<0.01) or cognitive delays (0.20 [CI 95% 0.13, 0.31]<0.01) were less likely to receive neuropsychological testing, as were those with genetic etiology (0.5x, [CI 95% 0.33, 0.75] p<0.01). The number of domains evaluated within corpus callosotomy (CC) (median 3, (1-9)<0.01) and hemispherectomy (median 4 (1-9)< 0.01) groups was significantly lower than testing in other surgical groups. In addition the cognitive IQ and adaptive IQ were lower in patients undergoing CC and compared to other groups. All types of patients undergoing palliative epilepsy surgery had some neuropsychological testing. However, those with lower IQ and those undergoing CC or hemispherectomy were less likely to undergo testing. Reduced rates of testing in certain groups indicates room for improvement, especially given recommendations to use testing to help determine surgical success.

Surgery: All Ages

Palliative Surgery for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Adult Patients. A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Pooled Analysis of Outcomes

Initial Findings With the Use of a Novel Performance Metric to Identify Institutional Rates of Radiation Discontinuation

As awareness of pediatric epilepsy increases, accompanied by advancements in technology and research, it is important to identify certain types of patients that are overlooked for surgical management of epilepsy. Identifying these populations will allow us to study and elucidate the factors contributing to the underutilization and/or delayed application of surgical interventions. Demographically, African-American and Hispanic patients, as well as patients of certain Asian ethnicities, have relatively lower rates of undergoing epilepsy surgery than non-Hispanic and white patients. Among patients with epilepsy, those with higher odds of seizure-freedom following surgery are more likely to be referred for surgical evaluation by their neurologists, with the most common diagnosis being lesional focal epilepsy. However, patients with multifocal or generalized epilepsy, genetic etiologies, or normal (non-lesional) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are less likely be to referred for evaluation for resective surgery. With an increasing number of high-quality imaging modalities to help localize the epileptogenic zone as well as new techniques for both curative and palliative epilepsy surgery, there are very few populations of patients and/or types of epilepsy that should be precluded from evaluation to determine the suitability of epilepsy surgery. Ultimately, a clearer understanding of the populations who are underrepresented among those considered for epilepsy surgery, coupled with further study of the underlying reasons for this trend, will lead to less disparity in access to this critical treatment among patients with epilepsy.

Surgical Management of Intractable Childhood Epilepsy: Curative and Palliative Procedures

Approximately one third of epilepsy patients are not adequately treatable by antiepileptic medication. Curative resective epilepsy surgery can be performed in only a subgroup of these pharmacoresistent patients in whom the epileptogenic focus is localizable and does not overlap with eloquent brain areas. To the remaining patients (with bilateral or multiple epileptogenic foci, with epilepsy onset in eloquent areas, or with no identifiable epileptogenic focus) palliative epilepsy surgery can be offered if they suffer from disabling seizures. Standard palliative procedures currently comprise corpus callosotomy, multiple subpial transections, and vagus nerve stimulation. New approaches such as focus distant deep brain stimulation or direct stimulation of the hippocampus have gained the most interest. Feasibility studies, small pilot studies, and, recently, larger multicenter trials showed that direct brain stimulation shall be considered a potential helpful procedure in the field of palliative surgery. Moreover, with the increasing use of stereo-EEG in invasive video-EEG monitoring, stereo-EEG-guided thermocoagulation has the potential for a promising new treatment option in patients not amenable to resective epilepsy surgery. There is no general consensus on which palliative procedure is most effective in patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy syndromes. The decision must be based on individual factors of a given patient. This review summarizes experience with palliative approaches collected in adult and pediatric patient series over the past decades and may help to thoroughly balance beneficial effects and risks of each procedure.

Pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is defined as epilepsy that is not controlled by two or more appropriately chosen and dosed anti-seizure medications (ASMs). When alternative therapies or surgical intervention is not viable or efficacious, advanced options like deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) may be considered. Describe the Stanford early institutional experience with DBS and RNS in pediatric DRE patients. Retrospective chart review of seizure characteristics, prior therapies, neurosurgical operative reports, and postoperative outcome data in pediatric DRE patients who underwent DBS or RNS placement. Nine patients had DBS at 16.0 ± 0.9 years and 8 had RNS at 15.3 ± 1.7 years (mean ± SE). DBS targets included the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (78% of DBS patients), anterior nucleus of the thalamus (11%), and pulvinar (11%). RNS placement was guided by stereo-EEG and/or intracranial monitoring in all RNS patients (100%). RNS targets included specific seizure onset zones (63% of RNS patients), bilateral hippocampi (25%) and bilateral temporal lobes (12%). Only DBS patients had prior trials of ketogenic diet (56%) and VNS therapy (67%). Four DBS patients (44%) had prior neurosurgical interventions, including callosotomy (22%) and focal resection (11%). One RNS patient (13%) and one DBS patient (11%) required revision surgery. Two DBS patients (22%) developed postoperative complications. Three RNS patients (38%) underwent additional resections; one RNS patient had electrocorticography recordings for seizure mapping before surgery. For patients with a follow-up of at ≥1 year (n = 7 for DBS and n = 5 for RNS), all patients had reduced seizure burden. Clinical seizure freedom was achieved in 80% of RNS patients and 20% had a >90% reduction in seizure burden. The majority (71%) of DBS patients had a ≥50% reduction in seizures. No patients experienced no change or worsening of seizure frequency. In the early Stanford experience, DBS was used as a palliatively for generalized or mixed DRE refractory to other resective or modulatory approaches. RNS was used for multifocal DRE with a clear seizure focus on stereo-EEG and no prior surgical interventions. Both modalities reduced seizure burden across all patients. RNS offers the additional benefit of providing data to guide future surgical planning.

Palliative epilepsy surgery is considered for patients that would benefit from surgical therapy for intractable epilepsy but are not candidates for curative procedures. In many cases, the goals of therapy focus on improved quality of life more than seizure freedom. We discuss the use of epilepsy surgery for refractory status epilepticus, as well as the rationale and ethical considerations for employing a palliative procedure in otherwise fatal diseases. We present a child with Alpers' disease presenting with refractory status epilepticus which was treated with functional hemispherectomy after failure of multiple typical therapies. Hemispherectomy allowed for the child to be extubated and ultimately discharged to home with her family. Unfortunately, the child died several months later after developing new-onset liver failure in the setting of a viral illness. Functional hemispherectomy was effective for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in Alpers' disease. We believe that the procedure resulted in improved quality of life which was the primary outcome goal. Palliative procedures should be considered in diseases with ultimate fatal outcome when the short-term benefits outweigh the risks. The ethical aspects of treatment must be carefully considered to insure treatment is provided in the best interest of the patient.

Neurosurgery is a safe and effective form of treatment for select children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Still, there is concern that it remains underutilized, and that seizure freedom rates have not improved over time. We investigated referral and surgical practices, patient characteristics, and postoperative outcomes over the past two decades. We performed a retrospective cohort study of children referred for epilepsy surgery at a tertiary center between 2000 and 2018. We extracted information from medical records and analyzed temporal trends using regression analyses. A total of 1443 children were evaluated for surgery. Of these, 859 (402 females) underwent surgical resection or disconnection at a median age of 8.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 4.6-13.4). Excluding palliative procedures, 67% of patients were seizure-free and 15% were on no antiseizure medication (ASM) at 1-year follow-up. There was an annual increase in the number of referrals (7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.3-8.6; p < .001) and surgeries (4% [95% CI = 2.9-5.6], p < .001) over time. Duration of epilepsy and total number of different ASMs trialed from epilepsy onset to surgery were, however, unchanged, and continued to exceed guidelines. Seizure freedom rates were also unchanged overall but showed improvement (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.18; p = .027) after adjustment for an observed increase in complex cases. Children who underwent surgery more recently were more likely to be off ASMs postoperatively (OR 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08; p = .013). There was a 17% annual increase (95% CI = 8.4-28.4, p < .001) in children identified to have a genetic cause of epilepsy, which was associated with poor outcome. Children with drug-resistant epilepsy continue to be put forward for surgery late, despite national and international guidelines urging prompt referral. Seizure freedom rates have improved over the past decades, but only after adjustment for a concurrent increase in complex cases. Finally, genetic testing in epilepsy surgery patients has expanded considerably over time and shows promise in identifying patients in whom surgery is less likely to be successful.

IntroductionEpilepsy affects millions of children worldwide, with 20–40% experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are recommended for epilepsy surgery evaluation and may benefit from surgical management. However, many patients live with DRE for multiple years prior to surgical epilepsy referral or treatment or are never referred at all.ObjectiveWe aimed to describe factors associated with referral for epilepsy surgery in the USA, in order to identify disparities in DRE, characterize why they may exist, and recognize areas for improvement.MethodsPediatric patients diagnosed with DRE between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2020 were identified from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. Patients treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs) only, ASMs plus vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and ASMs plus cranial epilepsy surgery were studied regarding access to epilepsy surgery and disparities in care. This study used chi-square tests to determine associations between treatment time and preoperative factors. Preoperative factors studied included epilepsy treatment type, age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, geographic region, patient type, epilepsy type, and presence of pediatric complex chronic conditions (PCCCs).ResultsA total of 18,292 patients were identified; 10,240 treated with ASMs, 5019 treated with ASMs + VNS, and 3033 treated with ASMs + cranial epilepsy surgery. Sex was not found to significantly vary among groups. There was significant variation in age, census region, race/ethnicity, patient type, presence of PCCCs, diagnosis, and insurance (p < 0.001). Those treated surgically, either with VNS or cranial epilepsy surgery, were 2 years older than those medically treated. Additionally, those medically treated were less likely to be living in the Midwest (25.46%), identified as non-Hispanic white (51.78%), have a focal/partial epilepsy diagnosis (8.74%), and be privately insured (35.82%).ConclusionsWe studied a large administrative US database examining variables associated with surgical epilepsy evaluation and management. We found significant variation in treatment associated with age, US census region, race/ethnicity, patient type, presence of PCCCs, diagnosis, and health insurance type. We believe that these disparities in care are related to access and social determinants of health, and we encourage focused outreach strategies to mitigate these disparities to broaden access and improve outcomes in children in the USA with DRE.

Epilepsy Surgery

ObjectivesThe Children’s Epilepsy Surgery Service (CESS) aims to improve access of eligible paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy to surgical management. Eligibility criteria include different epileptic etiologies while MRI findings are...

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy that typically leads to decreased quality of life and deleterious neurodevelopmental comorbidities from medically refractory seizures. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the development and availability of novel treatment strategies for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome patient to improve seizure. Recent advances in neuromodulation and minimally invasive magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have paved the way for new treatments strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and MRgLITT corpus callosum ablation. These new strategies offer hope for children with drug-resistant generalized epilepsies, but important questions remain about the safety and effectiveness of these new approaches. In this review, we describe the opportunities presented by these new strategies and how each treatment strategy is currently being employed. Next, we will critically assess available evidence for these new approaches compared to traditional palliative epilepsy surgery approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and open microsurgical corpus callosotomy (CC). Finally, we will describe future directions that would help define which of the available strategies should be employed and when.