Pediatric facial fractures: analysis of differences in subspecialty care.

Abstract

At the University of Michigan, the pediatric facial fracture call schedule rotates through the plastic surgery, otolaryngology, and oral surgery services. This situation provides an opportunity to evaluate differences in the management of pediatric facial fractures between subspecialty groups. At this hospital, a retrospective review of all pediatric facial fracture cases within a 5-year period was undertaken. Sixty patients with 82 facial fractures were studied along subspecialty lines. Differences in patient groups, practice patterns, and treatment strategies based on subspecialty assignment were found. Overall treatment followed traditional lines, with plastic surgeons involved in all types of pediatric facial fractures, whereas otolaryngology and oral surgeons were more limited in their operative scope, despite equal call responsibilities. It is believed that the managed care arena is a competitive environment in which it will be important to know the strengths and weaknesses of the plastic surgery specialty, as well as those of competing specialties, as patient contracts are negotiated. The overlap of plastic surgery, otolaryngology, and oral surgery in the care of facial trauma could result in plastic surgeons being left off of managed care participant lists. This study highlights plastic surgeons as efficient deliverers of quality care for pediatric facial fractures. Although the treatment of these fractures has fallen into the duties shared by all three subspecialties, data such as those presented here should strengthen our ability to succeed in the evolving environment of managed care.