Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between emergency department (ED) and inpatients setting at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH). Methods: The study was a retrospective cohort chart review of pediatric CPR at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) from January 2012 till August 2017. The CPR sheets were reviewed for four main variables: patient related, event related, treatment and outcomes. Results: A total of 83 cases were included, 48 males (58%) and 35 females (42%). Two Thirds of the patients (n=56) were in-patient; whereas one third of cases were from ED (n=27). Overall, most common cause for arrest that accounted 73.5% (n=61) was due to respiratory arrest. Events were more common in younger age group with 50% in less than 1 year (n=41). Bradycardia with hypo-perfusion represented most of arrest type 65% (n=54) followed by asystole 31% (n=26). Only 10% of patient survived to discharge (n=8). In comparison, 89% of ED arrest were unwitnessed. On the other hand, PICU and ward arrests predominantly were monitored 98% (n=55). ED patients’ survival appeared better at 19.2% (n=5) within 24hrs post arrest and 11.5% (n=3) within 1-year in comparison to PICU/Ward of 8.9% (n=5) survival within 24hrs and 1-year post event yet it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The survival outcome in resuscitation was almost similar between ED & In-patient setting (PICU/wards) cardiopulmonary arrests despite having few significant differences based on variables. Overall, 10% of patients survived to discharge and higher survival rates are associated with duration of CPR less than 20 minutes . Intraosseous route is underutilized and should be applied earlier especially in ED to prevent delay in administration of resuscitation medications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call