Abstract

This study explored pedestrians’ understanding of Fully Autonomous Vehicles (FAVs) intention to stop and what influences pedestrians’ decision to cross the road over time, i.e., learnability. Twenty participants saw fixed simulated urban road crossing scenes with a single FAV on the road as if they were pedestrians intending to cross. Scenes differed from one another in the FAV’s, distance from the crossing place, its physical size, and external Human-Machine Interfaces (e-HMI) message by background color (red/green), message type (status/advice), and presentation modality (text/symbol). Eye-tracking data and decision measurements were collected. Results revealed that pedestrians tend to look at the e-HMI before making their decision. However, they did not necessarily decide according to the e-HMIs’ color or message type. Moreover, when they complied with the e-HMI proposition, they tended to hesitate before making the decision. Overall, a learning effect over time was observed in all conditions regardless of e- HMI features and crossing context. Findings suggest that pedestrians’ decision making depends on a combination of the e-HMI implementation and the car distance. Moreover, since the learning curve exists in all conditions and has the same proportion, it is critical to design an interaction that would encourage higher probability of compatible decisions from the first phase. However, to extend all these findings, it is necessary to further examine dynamic situations.

Highlights

  • Crossing the street in the Fully Autonomous vehicle (FAV) era will differ from road crossing today since, among other things, the crossing decision will not be influenced by informal pedestrian – driver human-human communication that is necessary to understand driver intention (Rasouli et al, 2018)

  • Simulation studies reported that an external human-machine interfaces (e-HMI) mounted on the vehicle enhances the interaction with pedestrians by reducing the uncertainty regarding FAV intent, improving pedestrians’ initial trust and understanding (Deb et al, 2018; Ackermann et al, 2019; Ackermans et al, 2020)

  • This study revealed, from analyzing the number of fixations and response time, that pedestrians tend to decide for themselves whether to cross the road based on a combination of the FAV distance from the crossing place and the e-HMI background color and instructions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crossing the street in the Fully Autonomous vehicle (FAV) era will differ from road crossing today since, among other things, the crossing decision will not be influenced by informal pedestrian – driver human-human communication (like eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, or body movements) that is necessary to understand driver intention (Rasouli et al, 2018). Even after a malfunction, trust and confidence recovered quickly (Holländer and Butz, 2019) Inconsistent with this claim, a Wizard of Oz (WoZ) study suggested that people prefer to decide for themselves when to cross, as they do today, based on the FAV’s distance and speed from their crossing point (Clamann et al, 2017). Another videobased study followed by questionnaires reported similar trends (Mahadevan et al, 2018)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call