Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article I analyze Michèle Le Dœuff's rich diagnosis of the way philosophical pedagogy excludes women and her proposal for philosophy's transformation into a more open and plural endeavor. I argue, however, that Le Dœuff does not address the question of how philosophy thus transformed should be taught. I thus explore the ways that her vision of a pluralized philosophy could be incorporated into philosophical pedagogy, providing a Le Dœuffian alternative to the traditional pedagogical model she opposes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
