Abstract
Pedagogical pluralism is difficult to implement in practice. This paper contrasts two approaches to the modelling of money in macroeconomics: the stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model of Godley and Lavoie and the mainstream neoclassical dynamic general equilibrium model of Barro. Students can contrast and compare approaches effectively when thematic overlaps are significantly large to make comparisons obvious. Only then should a pluralist approach be considered desirable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
