Abstract
Pecuniary valuation is the peculiar characteristic of present-day American political life, with no better illustration than our incumbent president. This paper considers the responsibility of economists for this condition, in light of the inequality dynamics that helped to produce the 2016 election outcome. I show that states with the greatest increases of inequality from 1990 to 2014 invariably voted for the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, while states with smaller inequality increases generally voted for Donald Trump. This outcome reflected an underlying rebellion against the professional elites. Though members of those same elites, economists have greatly undermined the reputation of this class, because their doctrines work to deny the utility of other professionals—scientists, engineers, lawyers, accountants—who serve a regulatory function in the market system. Economists therefore serve as enablers of the oligarchy, of the predator class, of the systems of direct rule under which we live.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.