PECULIARITIES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF COURT CASES BETWEEN JUDGES

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal regulation of the relations related to the functioning of the automated system of court documents circulation by means of innovative methods in order to improve the administrative and administrative functions in the judicial system of the country. The judicial system has been the focus of much public debate in recent years. The content of these debates lies in the efficiency of the functioning of the judiciary. Considering the real impact of the people of the judiciary and litigants on the need to achieve the optimal distribution of court cases among judges in real time is an urgent need for this branch of government today. Accordingly, the use of methods and methods that will facilitate the work of the court and satisfy the requirements of participants in the process of administrative construction of the distribution of court cases and achieve as a result of a good indicator of the quality of court services is becoming a significant lever. Courts exercise the judiciary independently, regardless of their will, subject only to the Constitution of Ukraine and the legislation of Ukraine. The quality of this activity, including the accessibility of the judiciary, the promptness, reasonableness and fairness of justice, is ensured not only by the judges, but also by their assistants and other officials of the apparatus. Creating a real optimization of the distribution of court cases is the driving force behind the process of creating an effective system in creating a high-quality operational functioning of the court apparatus and justifying trust in justice. It is no accident that the disclosure of this problem has been made since there is always a contradiction between the benefits of ensuring the transparency of court work and the swift and qualified resolution of cases. Human resources in the system of effective judicial administration in terms of the distribution of court cases among judges are significant levers in improving this system. An automated system makes this process a more innovative way, and a person must identify the best means of such filtering, by which, not only will the cases be quickly distributed and confidence from the participants of the process lost, but also a competent and prompt decision is made. Creating a positive image of the judiciary through the effective work of judges through the “prism” of courtroom auxiliaries is the primary purpose of this article.