Abstract

BackgroundStress calculations in atherosclerotic coronary vulnerable plaques can aid in predicting coronary cap rupture. In vivo plaque geometry and composition of coronary arteries can merely be obtained via intravascular imaging. Only optical driven imaging techniques have sufficient resolution to visualize the fibrous cap, but due to limited penetration depth deeper components such as the backside of the necrotic core (NC) are generally not visible. The goal of this study was to investigate whether peak cap stresses can be approximated by reconstructing the backside of the NC.MethodsManual segmentations of coronary histological cross-sections served as a geometrical ground truth and were obtained from seven patients resulting in 73 NCs. Next, the backside was removed and reconstructed according to an estimation of the relative necrotic core thickness (rNCt). The rNCt was estimated at three locations along the NC angle and based on either group averaged parameters or plaque specific parameters. Stress calculations were performed in both the ground truth geometry and the reconstructed geometries and compared.ResultsGood geometrical agreement was found between the ground truth NC and the reconstructed NCs, based on group averaged rNCt estimation and plaque specific rNCt estimation, measuring the NC area difference (25.1 % IQR 14.0–41.3 % and 17.9 % IQR 9.81–32.7 %) and similarity index (0.85 IQR 0.77–0.90 and 0.88 IQR 0.79–0.91). The peak cap stresses obtained with both reconstruction methods showed a high correlation with respect to the ground truth, r2 = 0.91 and r2 = 0.95, respectively. For high stress plaques, the peak cap stress difference with respect to the ground truth significantly improved for the NC reconstruction based plaque specific features (6 %) compared to the reconstruction group averaged based (16 %).ConclusionsIn conclusion, good geometry and stress agreement was observed between the ground truth NC geometry and the reconstructed geometries. Although group averaged rNCt estimation seemed to be sufficient for the NC reconstruction and stress calculations, including plaque specific data further improved stress predictions, especially for higher stresses.

Highlights

  • Stress calculations in atherosclerotic coronary vulnerable plaques can aid in predicting coronary cap rupture

  • The generalized estimation equation (GEE) model showed a significant correlation between the estimated relative NC thickness (rNCt) and the ground truth rNCt: at midcap (r2 = 0.47) and at sidecap (r2 = 0.44), see Table 2

  • The following are the two main findings of this study: (1) high agreement was found between the necrotic core (NC) geometries and the corresponding peak cap stresses of the reconstructed NCs and the ground truth, (2) reconstructing the NC based on average NC data resulted in underestimated peak cap stresses for high stress plaques only, whereas including plaque specific data for the NC reconstruction improved the stress prediction for these high stress plaques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stress calculations in atherosclerotic coronary vulnerable plaques can aid in predicting coronary cap rupture. The goal of this study was to investigate whether peak cap stresses can be approximated by reconstructing the backside of the NC. Pathological studies showed that rupture prone plaques consists of a large necrotic core (NC), a thin fibrous cap and often are positively remodeled [21]. Determining stresses in a cap can aid in predicting cap rupture. The most important geometric factor influencing peak cap stress (PCS) predictor is cap thickness, and lumen size and shape and NC size and shape [1, 2, 7, 8, 16, 19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.