Abstract
In order that international boundaries shall be stable, peaceful and fair, the substantial principle of boundary jurisprudence should traverse holistic path addressing multiple factors. The rule of uti possidetis juris has a colonial basis and purpose, and is not a norm of invariable application despite its initial insights. Treaty allows holistic consideration but depends upon consensus of parties. Third World approach aims at justness of boundary from the perspective of equity, human rights and welfare, and favours wider consultation of interests. The Indian experience on international boundaries reflects a mosaic of fair principles of dispute resolution and experiments with third worldism anchoring on peace and stability. It is a beacon light for larger application in and outside the Indian sub-continent.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
