Peaceful resolution of international boundary disputes: drawing lessons from the Indian experiences

Abstract

In order that international boundaries shall be stable, peaceful and fair, the substantial principle of boundary jurisprudence should traverse holistic path addressing multiple factors. The rule of uti possidetis juris has a colonial basis and purpose, and is not a norm of invariable application despite its initial insights. Treaty allows holistic consideration but depends upon consensus of parties. Third World approach aims at justness of boundary from the perspective of equity, human rights and welfare, and favours wider consultation of interests. The Indian experience on international boundaries reflects a mosaic of fair principles of dispute resolution and experiments with third worldism anchoring on peace and stability. It is a beacon light for larger application in and outside the Indian sub-continent.