Abstract
In theology and in general, there are perceptions about peace as the absence of war and strife. However, if these perceptions are measured against what the prophets Isaiah and Micah teach explicitly about it, a different reality is sketched. Isaiah 2:1–5 is widely seen as a vision of peace. However, the concept שָׁלוֹם ( shalom [peace]) does not appear in the pericope, but only later in Isaiah 9:5 and then further on throughout the book. The thought of Isaiah 9:5 is repeated in Micah 5:4. The question that needs to be answered is: What is the real meaning of שָׁלוֹם in the Isaiah and Micah passages? To answer the question, all the verses in Isaiah and Micah in which the concept שָׁלוֹם occurs, were first identified in the Biblia Hebraica Stutgartensia. Thereafter, it was placed in cohesive groups. With this information in mind, the way peace was lost in Isaiah and Micah is described. Then the new beginning that God has made, is discussed exegetically in the passages where שָׁלוֹם occurs to show how peace was returned. It was found that שָׁלוֹם is never described in Isaiah and Micah in terms of the absence of a modality such as war, but in terms of relationships. Peace is therefore not a condition established by people, but exists primarily within a relationship between God and people. What the prophets, Isaiah and Micah, teach us about peace should influence our thinking in such a way that our perception of it should be reviewed. Contribution: The reality of peace, as seen from the perspective of Isaiah and Jeremiah, calls for a line of thought that is not currently at the forefront. Peace should therefore not be seen as a situation that people create. Instead, the biblical view is that it emanates from a relationship that begins with God and is then expressed in relationships with fellow human beings.
Highlights
In theology and in general, there are perceptions about peace as the absence of war and strife. Levin (2008−2010) put it as follows: In the ancient world peace meant the absence of destructive conflicts, just as it does today
As indicated in the problem statement, the perception of peace in both social and theological thinking is that of the absence of destructive conflicts
If the concept of peace is explored in the rest of Isaiah and Micah, other inferences can be made
Summary
In theology and in general, there are perceptions about peace as the absence of war and strife. Levin (2008−2010) put it as follows: In the ancient world peace meant the absence of destructive conflicts, just as it does today. Levin (2008−2010) put it as follows: In the ancient world peace meant the absence of destructive conflicts, just as it does today. As far as the absence of destructive conflicts in Old Testament context is concerned, two passages are normally referred to: Isaiah 2:4 and Micah 4:3. These passages are very similar and is often called a vision of peace.. The question that needs to be answered, is the following: What is the real meaning of ָׁשלֹוםin the Isaiah and Micah passages?. It will be indicated that peace is more than the absence of conflict as it is quite often portrayed, and that real peace can only be experienced through servanthood
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
