Abstract
Numerous reliability and validity studies have appeared since publication of the Revised Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. This article is a one-year review of available research to data and an appraisal of the PPVT-R. The PPVT-R consistently demonstrates adequate alternate form equivalence across samples, and consistently evidences significantly lower standard scores than its earlier version (PPVT) and traditional cognitive tests (WISC-R and Stanford-Binet).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
