Abstract

There is increasing interest in including pulse proteins into food products due to their nutrient-rich and sustainable character. However, little is known regarding the consequences of different extraction approaches on the pulse protein structure and the subsequent protein (micro)structural organization and protein digestion kinetics. Therefore, three green pea protein extracts were created: (i) cooking followed by cotyledon cell isolation, (ii) alkaline extraction followed by isoelectric precipitation, or (iii) salt extraction, and compared to the original pea flour as well as to sodium caseinate. The results showed that encapsulated, denatured protein inside pea cotyledon cells presented the (s)lowest digestion, while accessible and more native protein (e.g., pea flour, pea protein salt extract) presented much faster and higher digestion. Moreover, the alkali extracted pea protein was denatured to some extent, significantly lowering in vitro digestion kinetics. In the second part, three different in vitro approaches were applied to digest the salt extracted pea protein. Semi-dynamic gastric digestion approaches simulate in vivo conditions more closely which especially impacted the rate of digestion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call