Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy VII1 Apr 2017PD73-08 THE IMPACT OF INTRA VS. POST-OPERATIVE BLOOD TRANSFUSION ON CANCER RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL FOLLOWING NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA Yasmin Abu-Ghanem, Zohar Dotan, Issac Kaver, Dorit Zilberman, and Jacob Ramon Yasmin Abu-GhanemYasmin Abu-Ghanem More articles by this author , Zohar DotanZohar Dotan More articles by this author , Issac KaverIssac Kaver More articles by this author , Dorit ZilbermanDorit Zilberman More articles by this author , and Jacob RamonJacob Ramon More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3201AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The effects of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on morbidity, mortality following cancer surgery have previously been demonstrated in several malignancies including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the significance of transfusion timing is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether intraoperative BT (InBT) differ from postoperative BT (PoBT) in regards to oncological outcomes in patients treated with nephrectomy for RCC. METHODS Study included 1159 patients with RCC who underwent radical (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) between 1988 and 2013. PBT was defined as receipt of packed red blood cells either during surgery or during the postsurgical hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate the association of BT with cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 1159 patients undergoing nephrectomy, 198 patients (17.1%) received a PBT. Patients were next divided into 3 groups; no PBT, InBT alone (n=117) and PoBT alone (n=60). Twenty one patients of the PBT group (10.6%) received both intra and post-operative transfusion. Given the small number of patients, this sub-group was excluded. On multivariate analyses, receipt of InBT was associated with significantly increased risk of local disease recurrence (HR: 2.3; P=0.025), metastatic progression (HR: 2.2; P=0.006), cancer- specific mortality (HR: 2.95; P=0.009) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.05; P=0.007); while receipt of a PoBT did not independently bear an increased risk of local recurrence (p = 0.1), metastatic progression (P=0.095) or kidney cancer death (P=0.53), yet did significantly increase the risk of overall mortality (HR: 2.6; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS In the current cohort, InBT but not PoBT was associated with significantly increased risk of cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. This observation requires further studies to assess the impact and management of more restrictive intraoperative blood management strategies. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1370 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Yasmin Abu-Ghanem More articles by this author Zohar Dotan More articles by this author Issac Kaver More articles by this author Dorit Zilberman More articles by this author Jacob Ramon More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.