Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Therapy II1 Apr 2017PD68-11 FATE OF RECURRENT OR PERSISTENT VARICOCELE IN THE ERA OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY: MICROSURGICAL SUBINGUINAL REDO VARICOCELECTOMY VERSUS OBSERVATION Selahittin Çayan and Erdem Akbay Selahittin ÇayanSelahittin Çayan More articles by this author and Erdem AkbayErdem Akbay More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3139AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The role of redo varicocelectomy in infertile males with recurrent or persistent varicocele is controversial in the era of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The aim of the study was to compare sperm parameters, pregnancy and miscarriage rates between the men with recurrent or persistent varicocele who underwent redo microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy or had observation only. METHODS The study included 217 infertile men with recurrent or persistent varicocele. The patients were divided into two groups: 120 men underwent redo microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair, and 97 had observation only, as the control group. All patients had clinical varicoceles, and recurrences were confirmed with color Doppler ultrasound. Indications for redo varicocelectomy were no improvement in semen parameters and not achieving pregnancy after at least 6 months of initial varicocelectomy. Difference in total motile sperm count (TMSC), serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and total testosterone levels from the beginning to the end of the study, pregnancy (spontaneous or with the use of ART) and miscarriage rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Baseline mean patient and female partners ages, recurrent varicocele sites, TMSC, serum FSH and total testosterone levels, time to recurrence and follow-up period did not significantly differ between the two groups. The mean TMSC increased from 20.93±2.87 to 45.54±6.28 million in the microsurgical redo varicocelectomy group, and decreased from 16.62±2.75 to 15.6±2.81 million in the control group, revealing significant difference between the two groups (p=0.000). Increase in total testosterone was significantly higher in the microsurgical redo varicocelectomy group (+1.36±0.32 ng/ml) than in the control group (-0.23±0.1 ng/ml) (p=0.000). Of the couples, 63 (52.5%) achieved to pregnancy in the redo microsurgical varicocelectomy group, and 38 (39.2%) had pregnancy in the control group (p<0.05). Spontaneous pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the microsurgical varicocelectomy group (39.7%) than in the control group (15.8%) (p<0.01). Use of ART to achieve pregnancy was significantly lower in the microsurgical varicocelectomy group (60.3%) than in the control group (84.2%) (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Microsurgical subinguinal redo varicocelectomy improves postoperative semen parameters, serum total testosterone level and spontaneous pregnancy rates, compared to the controls. It also decreases need for use and level of ART. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1343 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Selahittin Çayan More articles by this author Erdem Akbay More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.