Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD51-10 PERINEURAL INVASION AS A PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR FOR EARLY METASTATIC SPREAD IN PENILE CANCER Titus Murphy, Luis Ribeiro, Marta Skrodzka, Eleni Anastasiadis, Sylvia Yan, Benjamin Ayres, and Nicholas Watkin Titus MurphyTitus Murphy More articles by this author , Luis RibeiroLuis Ribeiro More articles by this author , Marta SkrodzkaMarta Skrodzka More articles by this author , Eleni AnastasiadisEleni Anastasiadis More articles by this author , Sylvia YanSylvia Yan More articles by this author , Benjamin AyresBenjamin Ayres More articles by this author , and Nicholas WatkinNicholas Watkin More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002622.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In a previous 2-centre study (Eur Urol 2010), we demonstrated that grade 3 disease (G3) and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) were independent risk factors for early metastatic SCC in penile cancer (SCCp). However, the role of perineural invasion (PNI) was not formally investigated. Our objective was to re-assess previously analysed variables using an updated data set and to determine whether PNI may additionally have a role in the prediction of occult lymph node metastases in SCCp. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively using a minimum data set generated by specialist histopathologists and multi-disciplinary team input from 2001–2020. For the analysis, all patients with SCCp and bilateral cN0 were included. Pathology from sentinel nodes stratified patients into pN+/pN0. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out using binary logistic regression to identify statistically significant independent risk factors for occult/early lymph node metastases. RESULTS: 735 patients (SCCp/cN0) were identified. 19% were pN+. Univariable analysis demonstrated histologic grade, stage, LVI and PNI as all being significantly (p<0.05) associated with occult nodal disease. PNI remained a significant risk factor on multivariable analysis (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.10-2.93, p=0.019) in addition to Grade 3 disease and LVI (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: PNI is an independent predictor of occult metastatic spread in penile carcinoma. Until now, the role of PNI as a prognostic indicator has not been as extensively examined when compared with tumour grade, stage, and presence of LVI. Its significance is not reflected in current guidelines on disease staging and management and this should be reconsidered. Source of Funding: St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e846 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Titus Murphy More articles by this author Luis Ribeiro More articles by this author Marta Skrodzka More articles by this author Eleni Anastasiadis More articles by this author Sylvia Yan More articles by this author Benjamin Ayres More articles by this author Nicholas Watkin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call