PD50-12 THE NATIONAL IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON US PROSTATE CANCER COMMUNITY CARE

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening V (PD50)1 Sep 2021PD50-12 THE NATIONAL IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON US PROSTATE CANCER COMMUNITY CARE Matthew Cooperberg, Paul Brendel, Daniel Lee, Rahul Doraiswami, Hariesh Rajasekar, Danil Makarov, William Meeks, Raymond Fang, Matthew Roe, and Jeremy Shelton Matthew CooperbergMatthew Cooperberg More articles by this author , Paul BrendelPaul Brendel More articles by this author , Daniel LeeDaniel Lee More articles by this author , Rahul DoraiswamiRahul Doraiswami More articles by this author , Hariesh RajasekarHariesh Rajasekar More articles by this author , Danil MakarovDanil Makarov More articles by this author , William MeeksWilliam Meeks More articles by this author , Raymond FangRaymond Fang More articles by this author , Matthew RoeMatthew Roe More articles by this author , and Jeremy SheltonJeremy Shelton More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002072.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We used data from a specialty-wide, community-based urology registry to determine trends in outpatient prostate cancer (PCa) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: 3,165 (∼ 25%) of US urology providers, representing 48 states and territories, participate in the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry, which collects data via automated extraction from electronic health record systems. We analyzed trends in PCa care delivery from 156 practices contributing data in 2019 and 2020. Risk stratification was based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason, and clinical T-stage, and we used a natural language processing algorithm to determine Gleason and T-stage from unstructured clinical notes. The primary outcome was mean weekly visit volume by PCa patients per practice (visits defined as all MD and mid-level visits, telehealth and face-to-face), and we compared each week in 2020 through week 44 (November 1) to the corresponding week in 2019. RESULTS: There were 267,691 PCa patients in AQUA who received care between 2019 and 2020. From mid-March to early November, 2020 (week 10 – week 44) the magnitude of the decline and recovery varied by risk stratum, with the steepest drops for low-risk PCa (Table). For 2020, overall mean visits per day (averaged weekly) were similar to 2019 for the first 9 weeks (∼25). Visits declined to week 14 (18.19; a 31% drop from 2019), recovered to 2019 levels by week 23, and declined steadily to 11.89 (a 58% drop from 2019) as of week 44, the cut off of this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Access to care for men with PCa was sharply curtailed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and while the impact was less for men with high-risk disease compared to those with low-risk disease, visits even for high-risk individuals were down nearly one-third and continued to fall through November. This study provides real-world evidence on the magnitude of decline in PCa care across risk groups. The impact of this decline on cancer outcomes should be followed closely. Source of Funding: Verana Health © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e856-e856 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Cooperberg More articles by this author Paul Brendel More articles by this author Daniel Lee More articles by this author Rahul Doraiswami More articles by this author Hariesh Rajasekar More articles by this author Danil Makarov More articles by this author William Meeks More articles by this author Raymond Fang More articles by this author Matthew Roe More articles by this author Jeremy Shelton More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...