Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyHealth Services Research: Practice Patterns, Quality of Life and Shared Decision Making IV (PD46)1 Sep 2021PD46-08 MEDIATORS OF RACIAL DISPARITY IN THE USE OF PROSTATE MRI Michael Leapman, Michaela Dinan, Saamir Pasha, Samuel Washington, Xiaomei Ma, and Cary Gross Michael LeapmanMichael Leapman More articles by this author , Michaela DinanMichaela Dinan More articles by this author , Saamir PashaSaamir Pasha More articles by this author , Samuel WashingtonSamuel Washington More articles by this author , Xiaomei MaXiaomei Ma More articles by this author , and Cary GrossCary Gross More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002060.08AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence of racial disparity in the use of prostate MRI presents new obstacles to closing recognized gaps in treatment and outcome for black men with prostate cancer. To anticipate strategies for improving equity in cancer care, we examined mediators of racial disparity in the use of prostate MRI surrounding the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multiple mediation analysis among patients with localized prostate cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database between January 2008 and December 2015. We assessed claims for prostate MRI within the six-month period preceding or following diagnosis. We first identified candidate clinical and sociodemographic meditators based on their association with both race and prostate MRI, including the Index of Concentrations at the Extremes (ICE), a measure of racialized residential segregation calculated at the zip code or census tract level. We used non-linear Multiple Additive Regression Trees (MART) models to estimate the direct and indirect relative effects of mediators. RESULTS: We identified 71,597 eligible patients. Black patients with prostate cancer were less likely (5.3%) to receive a prostate MRI when compared with white patients (7.0%; unadjusted odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84, p<0.001). 33.1% (95% CI 20.6-44.9) of the racial disparity in prostate MRI use was attributable to variation in SEER region, 22.5% (95% CI 13.0-30.2) to residence in a high poverty area, 17.2% to residential segregation (ICE group 17.2%, 95% CI 8.1-27.9%), and 13.2% to dual eligibility for Medicaid (95% CI 8.6-20.2%). Clinical and pathologic factors were not significant mediators. After accounting for the mediators, the direct effects of race accounted for 6.2% of the observed disparity in prostate MRI use. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors including geographic region, and area-level measures of income and residential segregation explain the majority of the observed racial disparity in the use of prostate MRI among older Americans with prostate cancer. The findings underscore that measurable structural factors can be readily identified that underlie racial disparity in access to emerging diagnostic tools for patients with cancer. Source of Funding: Yale Center for Clinical Investigation; National Cancer Institute (K08CA204732) © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e751-e751 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Leapman More articles by this author Michaela Dinan More articles by this author Saamir Pasha More articles by this author Samuel Washington More articles by this author Xiaomei Ma More articles by this author Cary Gross More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call