PD40-08 RENAL COLIC IMAGING PRACTICE PATTERNS IN ONTARIO: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD40-08 RENAL COLIC IMAGING PRACTICE PATTERNS IN ONTARIO: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY Danielle Jenkins, Greg Hosier, Marlo Whitehead, Rebecca Griffiths, Thomas McGregor, and D. Robert Siemens Danielle JenkinsDanielle Jenkins More articles by this author , Greg HosierGreg Hosier More articles by this author , Marlo WhiteheadMarlo Whitehead More articles by this author , Rebecca GriffithsRebecca Griffiths More articles by this author , Thomas McGregorThomas McGregor More articles by this author , and D. Robert SiemensD. Robert Siemens More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002601.08AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: CT scans are associated with increased cost and exposure to radiation when compared to ultrasound (US) in patients presenting with renal colic. Consequently, a Choosing Wisely recommendation from 2014 states that US should be used over CT in uncomplicated presentations of renal colic in patients under the age of 50. The objective of this study was to describe imaging practice patterns in Ontario among patients presenting with renal colic and the relationship between initial imaging modality, subsequent imaging, and burden of care indicators. METHODS: This is a population-based study of patients who presented with renal colic in Ontario between 2003 and 2019 using administrative data. Patients were assessed according to the first imaging modality they had during their index visit. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were used to examine differences between these groups. The primary outcome was the need for subsequent imaging. Secondary outcomes included length of renal colic episode, days to surgery, number of emergency department visits, and number of primary care visits during the renal colic episode. RESULTS: A total of 429,060 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, 50.5% (216,747) had a CT scan as their initial imaging modality, 19.7% (84,672) had an US, and 3.2% (13,643) had both a CT and an US on the same day. Subsequent imaging was obtained in 40.7% of those who had a CT scan as the initial imaging, compared to 42.9% in those who had an US and 43.1% who had both an US at CT on the same day. Of those who initially had an US, 38.0% went on to have at least one CT scan during their renal colic episode, including those who had a CT on the same day as the initial US, while 62.0% were able to avoid a CT scan altogether. In contrast, 16.8% had a repeat CT after an initial CT at the time of presentation. The length of the renal colic episode was slightly longer in those who had a CT first compared to US (RR 1.005 CI 1.000-1.009), however the time to surgery was less in those who had a CT first (RR 0.831 CI 0.807-0.856). Fewer emergency department and family physician visits were seen in those who had an initial CT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with renal colic in Ontario, approximately half are having a CT done as the initial imaging modality despite US being the recommended imaging modality in uncomplicated renal colic presentations. Those who have an US done first are often able to avoid subsequent CT scans. Efforts should be made to encourage the use of US in those presenting with renal colic rather than CT when clinically indicated. Source of Funding: PSI Foundation © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e686 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Danielle Jenkins More articles by this author Greg Hosier More articles by this author Marlo Whitehead More articles by this author Rebecca Griffiths More articles by this author Thomas McGregor More articles by this author D. Robert Siemens More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...