Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Value of Care: Cost and Outcomes Measures III1 Apr 2017PD32-02 UNDERSTANDING PRE-ENROLLMENT FIRST YEAR COSTS OF UROLOGICAL CANCER CARE FOR HOSPITALS THAT WENT ON TO PARTICIPATE IN MEDICARE ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS Deborah R. Kaye, Hye Sung Min, Chad Ellimootil, Zaojun Ye, Jonathan Li, Lindsey A. Herrel, James M. Dupree, and David C. Miller Deborah R. KayeDeborah R. Kaye More articles by this author , Hye Sung MinHye Sung Min More articles by this author , Chad EllimootilChad Ellimootil More articles by this author , Zaojun YeZaojun Ye More articles by this author , Jonathan LiJonathan Li More articles by this author , Lindsey A. HerrelLindsey A. Herrel More articles by this author , James M. DupreeJames M. Dupree More articles by this author , and David C. MillerDavid C. Miller More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1393AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are a new delivery model that many believe will enhance care coordination and quality, while lowering costs, in patients with complex diagnoses like cancer. However, understanding the degree to which ACO participation improves outcomes depends on the performance of participants before they became ACOs. In this context, we measured and compared the total first year costs (i.e, initial phase) of urological cancer care among hospitals that did or did not enroll in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACO. METHODS Using linked SEER-Medicare claims, we identified patients >65 years who were diagnosed with prostate, bladder, or kidney cancer from 2008 through 2012. The initial phase of cancer care was defined by the 12 months after diagnosis for patients living > 12 months. Costs of cancer care were calculated by aggregating hospital, physician and post-acute care claims. We first attributed patients to the hospital at which they received the majority of their initial cancer care. Hospitals were then flagged as ACO or non-ACO hospitals (based on current hospital participation) using the MSSP ACO Provider File. Finally, we compared total and component costs during the initial phase of cancer care according to ACO participation status. RESULTS We identified 64,879 patients with prostate cancer, 19,554 patients with bladder and 9,484 patients with kidney cancer. The proportion of patients receiving care at a hospital that subsequently enrolled in the ACO program was 4%, 5%, and 5% for prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer, respectively. Prior to the initiation of the ACO program, patients attributed to current ACO hospitals had lower aggregate first year costs for prostate (p<0.001) and kidney cancer (p<0.001), but not bladder cancer (p=0.938). Differences in inpatient spending were +$305, +$1,245, and -$1,535 for prostate, bladder and kidney cancer, respectively (Figure). CONCLUSIONS Prior to formal participation, patients treated at hospitals now enrolled in the MSSP ACO program had lower costs for the first 12 months after diagnosis for prostate and kidney cancer, but not bladder cancer. Evaluations of the impact of ACO participation on costs of urologic cancer care may therefore be most fruitful among patients with bladder cancer. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e588-e589 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Deborah R. Kaye More articles by this author Hye Sung Min More articles by this author Chad Ellimootil More articles by this author Zaojun Ye More articles by this author Jonathan Li More articles by this author Lindsey A. Herrel More articles by this author James M. Dupree More articles by this author David C. Miller More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.