Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD24-10 AN INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS OF AGE-DEPENDENT GENETIC ABERRATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH RENAL CELL CANCER Ahmed El-Shafie, Mohammed Al-Toubat, SeyedBehzad Jazayeri, Soroush Bazargani, Allison H. Feibus, Devon Thomas, Mark Bandyk, and K. C. Balaji Ahmed El-ShafieAhmed El-Shafie More articles by this author , Mohammed Al-ToubatMohammed Al-Toubat More articles by this author , SeyedBehzad JazayeriSeyedBehzad Jazayeri More articles by this author , Soroush BazarganiSoroush Bazargani More articles by this author , Allison H. FeibusAllison H. Feibus More articles by this author , Devon ThomasDevon Thomas More articles by this author , Mark BandykMark Bandyk More articles by this author , and K. C. BalajiK. C. Balaji More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003302.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in younger age groups has steadily increased over the past two decades. However, the genetic and clinical characteristics of RCC in younger patients remain elusive. In this study, we performed targeted capture sequence to characterize the mutational spectrum of RCC patients across different age groups. METHODS: We queried the American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry. Key genes were identified in 1,081 patients diagnosed with RCC. We included mutations frequency rates of more than 5%. A total of 238 genes were sequenced in our cohort. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were computed. SPSS V24 was used for analyses. RESULTS: Patients were categorized into three groups: young (≤50 years old) (n=263, 24.3%), middle-age (51-69 years old) (n=580, 53.6%), and old (≥70 years old) (n=238, 22.1%). Of the 1,081 patients with RCC, 54% had clear cell histology; papillary RCC (26.5%) and chromophobe RCC (19.5%). The frequency of mutations affecting 6 genes (MUC4, MUC6, XPC, SRGAP3, ITPR1, CAPN7) were significantly higher in the young group compared to the other two groups (p<0.001) (Figure 1). Older patients with had significantly higher frequency of VHL, SETD2, TTN genes mutations with worse PFS (p value<0.001) and OS (p<0.001). (Figure 2) CONCLUSIONS: We found distinct genetic variations among young and older patients with RCC. Gene mutation analysis in patients with RCC may provide prognostic information in future. Source of Funding: none © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e727 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ahmed El-Shafie More articles by this author Mohammed Al-Toubat More articles by this author SeyedBehzad Jazayeri More articles by this author Soroush Bazargani More articles by this author Allison H. Feibus More articles by this author Devon Thomas More articles by this author Mark Bandyk More articles by this author K. C. Balaji More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.