Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD22-01 ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF SENTINEL LYMPH NODE PROCEDURE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS IMAGING-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER – A MULTICENTER, RETROSPECTIVE, PROPENSITY SCORE WEIGHTED COMPARISON Hilda de Barros, Nikolaos Grivas, Jan Duin, Daan Mulder, Vincent van der Noort, Arjen Noordzij, Esther Wit, Eva Schaake, Pim van Leeuwen, and Henk van der Poel Hilda de BarrosHilda de Barros More articles by this author , Nikolaos GrivasNikolaos Grivas More articles by this author , Jan DuinJan Duin More articles by this author , Daan MulderDaan Mulder More articles by this author , Vincent van der NoortVincent van der Noort More articles by this author , Arjen NoordzijArjen Noordzij More articles by this author , Esther WitEsther Wit More articles by this author , Eva SchaakeEva Schaake More articles by this author , Pim van LeeuwenPim van Leeuwen More articles by this author , and Henk van der PoelHenk van der Poel More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002564.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Insufficient sensitivity of current imaging techniques for nodal staging has led to the exploration of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to select primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients that might benefit from whole-pelvic nodal radiotherapy (WPRT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes of SLNB-based RT compared to imaging-based RT in cN0M0 PCa patients with an increased estimated risk of nodal metastases. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 522 cN0 primary PCa patients with a Briganti nomogram-estimated nodal risk >5% treated with external beam RT (EBRT) between 2007-2018. Nodal staging was performed either by radiological staging (261 (50%) patients) or by radiological staging and an additional robot-assisted laparoscopic SLNB (261 (50%) patients). All patients received RT to the prostate and 6 months to 3 years of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), whereas patients with a histologically positive sentinel node (pN1) also received RT to the pelvic LNs with 3 years of ADT. Endpoints included biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) and radiological recurrence-free survival (RR-FS). Propensity score weighted (PSW) multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of BCR and RR. RESULTS: Patients staged with SLNB had a higher rate of extracapsular extension (63% vs 35%, P <0.001) and were at higher risk of nodal metastases (43% vs 29%, P=0.002) compared to imaging-only staged patients. Median follow-up after primary treatment was 64 months (IQR 41-95). In total, 111 patients developed a BCR (SLNB=51, non-SLNB=60) and 98 patients developed a radiological recurrence (SLNB=50, non-SLNB=48; Fig 1). In PSW multivariable Cox regression analyses, SLNB-based RT was an independent predictor of both BCR (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59, P <0.001) and RR (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB-guided RT is associated with a decreased risk of BCR and RR when compared to prostate-only RT in cN0 PCa patients. These results suggest an important role for SLNB in selecting cN0 PCa patients that might profit from WPRT and ADT intensification, and justify a prospective comparison. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e402 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hilda de Barros More articles by this author Nikolaos Grivas More articles by this author Jan Duin More articles by this author Daan Mulder More articles by this author Vincent van der Noort More articles by this author Arjen Noordzij More articles by this author Esther Wit More articles by this author Eva Schaake More articles by this author Pim van Leeuwen More articles by this author Henk van der Poel More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.