PD17-08 THE EFFECT OF THE SURGICAL ROBOT ON THE HOSPITAL-LEVEL UTILIZATION OF PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The rapid diffusion of the surgical robot has been fraught with controversy because of the technology’s high costs and disputed marginal benefit. Some have suggested that adoption of the surgical robot has facilitated partial nephrectomy (PN), an underutilized procedure considered more challenging yet less morbid than radical nephrectomy. We sought to determine whether institutional acquisition of the robot was associated with a higher rate of PN. METHODS: We used the 2001, 2005 and 2008 Health-care Cost and Utilization Project State In-patient Databases from 7 states to identify 21,569 surgical procedures for renal tumors. These patient-level records were aggregated to the hospital-level then merged with the American Hospital Association Survey and with publicly available data on timing of robot acquisition. We used a difference-in-difference model to assess whether robot acquisition was associated with an increase in the PN rate, adjusting for total nephrectomy rate, year of surgery, year of robot acquisition and several hospital-level factors. We performed two sensitivity analyses to determine whether there was a time lag between robot acquisition and changes in PN utilization (because of a presumed necessity to develop requisite surgical skill) and to ensure no association existed between robot acquisition and performance of an unrelated procedure (the presence of which might suggest an unmeasured confounding characteristic was the actual cause for increased surgical volume). RESULTS: In the multivariable adjusted differences-in-differences model (Figure 1), hospitals acquiring a robot between 2001-2005 performed more PN in both 2005 (30% increase) and 2008 (35% total increase) (p<0.01 for both). Hospitals acquiring a robot in the time period between 2005-2008 also demonstrated higher rates of PN in 2008 (16% increase) (p1⁄40.02). Results of the secondary lag time analysis were not substantially different. There was no association between robot acquisition and utilization of an unrelated surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital acquisition of the robot is associated with increased utilization of PN, a guideline-encouraged procedure. This is one of the few studies to suggest acquisition of the surgical robot was associated with a clear improvement in quality of care.