PD14-11 PERCUTANEOUS URETHRAL SPHINCTER STIMULATION: SWINE MODEL FOR FEASIBILITY OF USE IN STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD14-11 PERCUTANEOUS URETHRAL SPHINCTER STIMULATION: SWINE MODEL FOR FEASIBILITY OF USE IN STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE Kyle Waisanen, Tyler Maiers, Peter Natalzia, and Teresa Danforth Kyle WaisanenKyle Waisanen More articles by this author , Tyler MaiersTyler Maiers More articles by this author , Peter NatalziaPeter Natalzia More articles by this author , and Teresa DanforthTeresa Danforth More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003261.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Current treatment modalities for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) include pelvic floor physical therapy, urethral bulking agents, and urethral sling support. We aim to assess direct electrical external urethral sphincter stimulation as a means for treating SUI patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of percutaneous external urethral sphincter access and urethral pressure profiles associated with direct electric sphincteric stimulation. METHODS: An IACUC-approved swine model study was performed under general anesthesia. The urinary bladder was accessed by open cystotomy for placement of antegrade 7F urethral pressure catheter. Stimulation leads were deployed into the external urethral sphincter under transvaginal ultrasound guidance and antegrade urethroscopy was performed to confirm urethral integrity. Leads were then stimulated with serial increases in amplitude from an external pulse generator from 0.1 mA to 3.6 mA with pressure monitoring of the external urethral sphincter. RESULTS: Three swine subjects were utilized in the study. All subjects underwent successful percutaneous insertion of stimulation leads into the EUS without urethral violation. External urethral sphincter pressures recorded with electric stimulation amplitudes of 0 mA, 1.8 mA, and 3.6 mA were found to exhibit increased urethral pressures of 6-10 cm H2O, 16-20 cm H2O, and 31-36 cm H2O, respectfully. EMG capture was achieved in each subject with a corresponding increase in EMG activity with pulse generator amplitude increase represented in the urodynamic strip from subject #2 (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: Direct external urethral sphincter stimulation with increased urethral closure pressures is achievable by an ultrasound-guided percutaneous approach. Further studies are required to assess long-term effects and success of the stimulation in SUI modeled subjects with promising results seen in this preliminary proof-of-concept study. Source of Funding: Lent Foundation, University at Buffalo © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e416 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kyle Waisanen More articles by this author Tyler Maiers More articles by this author Peter Natalzia More articles by this author Teresa Danforth More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...