Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Epidemiology & Evaluation I1 Apr 2017PD13-05 TESTICULAR CANCER AMONG INFERTILE MEN: A COST BASED RATIONALE FOR PROMOTING TESTICULAR SELF EXAMINATIONS Adithya Balasubramanian, Naveen Yadav, Edgar W. Kirby, Alexander W. Pastuszak, and Larry I. Lipshultz Adithya BalasubramanianAdithya Balasubramanian More articles by this author , Naveen YadavNaveen Yadav More articles by this author , Edgar W. KirbyEdgar W. Kirby More articles by this author , Alexander W. PastuszakAlexander W. Pastuszak More articles by this author , and Larry I. LipshultzLarry I. Lipshultz More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.693AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Testicular cancer (TC) is the most common malignancy among men 15-34 years old, and infertile men are at increased risk for TC. Here, we investigate the costs of screening infertile men for TC, and the cost savings associated with early detection and treatment of TC among infertile men. METHODS Incidence, prevalence and hazard ratios for TC and infertility were extracted from the literature and used to calculate the annual number of TC cases among infertile men. Costs associated with TC screening and treatment were compiled using existing Medicare reimbursement databases and published data. These costs were used to model the costs of screening and treatment of infertile men at risk for TC. RESULTS Using incidence, prevalence and census data, the number of infertile men in the U.S. was calculated to be 2,350,000. Using co-prevalence data, 375 new cases of TC per year were estimated in the infertile male population. Screening using testicular self-examination (TSE) resulted in no cost burden. Prior to treatment, confirmation of the diagnosis of TC in men with testicular masses included tumor markers and scrotal ultrasound; these costs are folded into treatment costs. Early treatment was defined as radical orchiectomy followed by low-dose chemotherapy. Late TC treatment was defined as radical orchiectomy followed by chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), as well as salvage chemotherapy. The total cost associated with early treatment of infertile men diagnosed with TC using TSE was $7,035,394, in contrast with a total cost of $19,350,096 for late treatment of this population. Thus, the cost savings resulting from early detection of TC in infertile men using TSE is approximately $12,314,701 per year. CONCLUSIONS Infertile men are at increased risk for TC. We find that early screening for TC among infertile men via TSE can result in early TC detection and significant cost savings resulting from early treatment. Despite U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations against TSE, TSE among infertile men represents a cost effective means of early TC detection in this at risk population. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byRichie J (2018) Re: Attitudes toward Testicular Cancer and Self-Examination among Northern Irish MalesJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 6, (1398-1399), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018. Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e272-e273 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Adithya Balasubramanian More articles by this author Naveen Yadav More articles by this author Edgar W. Kirby More articles by this author Alexander W. Pastuszak More articles by this author Larry I. Lipshultz More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call