PD10-11 DISTINCT CLINICAL GENOMIC VARIATIONS AMONG MEN WITH LOCALIZED VS METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD10-11 DISTINCT CLINICAL GENOMIC VARIATIONS AMONG MEN WITH LOCALIZED VS METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER Ahmed El-shafie, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Allison H. Feibus, SeyedBehzad Jazayeri, Soroush Bazargani, Devon Thomas, Mark Bandyk, and K.C. Balaji Ahmed El-shafieAhmed El-shafie More articles by this author , Mohammed Al-ToubatMohammed Al-Toubat More articles by this author , Allison H. FeibusAllison H. Feibus More articles by this author , SeyedBehzad JazayeriSeyedBehzad Jazayeri More articles by this author , Soroush BazarganiSoroush Bazargani More articles by this author , Devon ThomasDevon Thomas More articles by this author , Mark BandykMark Bandyk More articles by this author , and K.C. BalajiK.C. Balaji More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003250.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify unique genetic mutations associated with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) by comparing next generation sequencing (NGS) data between men with localized and metastatic disease METHODS: We queried the American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) registry for men diagnosed with PCa. Patients were categorized into localized (m0) and metastatic (m1) groups. The difference in the frequency of genetic mutations between the two groups and the prognostic significance of the differentially expressed genes were analysed using SPSS V24. We included frequency rates of >5% and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant to maintain over 95% true positive detection rate. RESULTS: A total of 1,027 patients, with localized (n=459) and metastatic PCa (n=568) were included in the study. Patients were mostly non-Hispanic White men (89%) with a median age of 61 years (IQR 56-66 years). 421 (41%) of our cohort had Gleason grade group (GG) 2 disease, 277 (27%) had GG3 disease, and 267 (26%) had GG4 or GG5 disease. We identified alterations in 89 genes in our analyses. Patients with M1PCa had significantly higher genomic aberrations in TMPRSS2 (31.51% vs 11.14%, p<0.001); ERG fusion (23.59% vs 13.13%, p<0.001); PTEN loss (25.7% vs 16.16%, p<0.001); TP53 mutation (38.73% vs 12.23%, p<0.001); FOXA1 (17.43% vs 6.33%, p<0.001); KMT2C (9.51% vs 6.11%, p=0.02) (Figure 1). We then isolated the signalling pathways most likely to be affected by these mutations, and found that the androgen receptor was most often impacted (Figure 2). Patients with alterations in all 6 of the genes listed above had the worst progression-free survival (p = <0.01, log rank test) (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: In M1PCa, patients had significantly higher frequency of TMPRSS2, ERG, PTEN loss, TP53, FOXA1, and KMT2C somatic gene mutations compared to samples from patients with m0PCa. Additionally, patients who had mutations in all 6 of these genes harboured more aggressive cancer and poorer outcomes. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e330 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ahmed El-shafie More articles by this author Mohammed Al-Toubat More articles by this author Allison H. Feibus More articles by this author SeyedBehzad Jazayeri More articles by this author Soroush Bazargani More articles by this author Devon Thomas More articles by this author Mark Bandyk More articles by this author K.C. Balaji More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...