Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD07-12 THE PERIOPERATIVE SAFETY OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY IN OCTOGENARIANS Dhaval Jivanji, Michael West, Katiana Vazquez-Rivera, Marc Lubin, Ervin Teper, David Silver, and Ariel Schulman Dhaval JivanjiDhaval Jivanji More articles by this author , Michael WestMichael West More articles by this author , Katiana Vazquez-RiveraKatiana Vazquez-Rivera More articles by this author , Marc LubinMarc Lubin More articles by this author , Ervin TeperErvin Teper More articles by this author , David SilverDavid Silver More articles by this author , and Ariel SchulmanAriel Schulman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003231.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Octogenarians with renal masses amenable to partial nephrectomy often receive a radical nephrectomy. This stems from concerns that the renorrhaphy may not heal appropriately and that older patients may not tolerate major complications such as bleeding or urine leak. Using a national cohort, we compared complications and 30-day outcomes in octogenarians who received a partial or radical nephrectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify all subjects 80 years or older who received a minimally invasive partial (CPT: 50543) or radical nephrectomy (CPT: 50545, 50546) from 2016 to 2020. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and post-operative complications were compared. Emergent cases, subjects with disseminated disease, and subjects with concurrent procedures were excluded. Chi square analysis and student t-tests were used to analyze categorial and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 1,609 nephrectomies of which, 1,226 (76.2%) were radical and 383 (23.8%) were partial. Those who underwent partial nephrectomy were younger (82 years old vs. 83 years old, p < 0.001). A similar proportion of men (58.5% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.34) and women (40.5% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.34) were seen in each group, and there was no difference in BMI (27.7 vs. 27.2, p = 0.08). Operative times were longer (165.5 mins vs. 150.2, p <0.001) but length of stay was shorter (3 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) in the partial nephrectomy group. No differences were seen in post-operative complications. Octogenarians who underwent a partial nephrectomy were readmitted at higher rates (11.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.003); however, there was no difference in reoperative rates (2.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.24) or mortality (1.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rates in octogenarians who received a partial nephrectomy were higher than those who received a radical nephrectomy; however, no other differences in adverse events were seen. Therefore, we should consider expanding the use of partial nephrectomy in this age cohort. Future studies are needed to explore surgeon parameters and oncological characteristics. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e167 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Dhaval Jivanji More articles by this author Michael West More articles by this author Katiana Vazquez-Rivera More articles by this author Marc Lubin More articles by this author Ervin Teper More articles by this author David Silver More articles by this author Ariel Schulman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.