Abstract

Lung adenosquamous cell carcinomas (ASCs) is a rare variant of NSCLC with a poorer prognosis and fewer treatment option than the more common variants. PD-L1 expression is reported to be the predictor of clinical response in trials of NSCLC. In our study, PD-L1 expression was evaluated via immunohistochemistry using a specific monoclonal antibody (SP263), and PD-L1 mRNA expression was evaluated via in situ hybridization. This study included 51 ASCs, 133 lung adenocarcinomas, and 83 lung squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Similar results were obtained for PD-L1 expression measured at the mRNA and protein level (k coefficient, 0.851, P = 1.000). PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in the squamous versus glandular component of the 36 ASCs in which the components were analyzed separately. The PD-L1 expression rate was similar in the squamous cell component of ASCs and lung SCC (38.89% vs. 28.92%, P = 0.293), so does the adenocarcinoma component of ASCs and lung adenocarcinomas (11.11% vs 13.53%, P = 1.000). PD-L1 expression correlated significantly with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.016), but not with EGFR, KRAS, and ALK mutations in lung ASCs. Anit-PD-L1 is a promising treatment option in lung ASC cases in which PD-L1 upregulated and EGFR mutations are present.

Highlights

  • Between PD-L1 expression and 1) various clinicopathological characteristics and 2) alterations in major driver oncogenes including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)

  • PD-L1 expression was detected by IHC and in situ hybridization (ISH) in 39.22% and 37.25% of the lung adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC), respectively

  • Our study evaluated PD-L1 expression in 51 lung ASCs, 133 lung adenocarcinomas, and 83 lung squamous cell carcinomas, and showed expression rates of 39.22%, 28.92%, and 13.53%, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Between PD-L1 expression and 1) various clinicopathological characteristics and 2) alterations in major driver oncogenes including EGFR, KRAS, and ALK. A reliable detection system is needed, and toward this goal, we compared PD-L1 expression determined via two different methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RNA in situ hybridization (ISH)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call