PCR identification of Leishmania in diagnosis and control of canine leishmaniasis

Abstract

Leishmaniases are endemic in many countries, mainly in rural areas. In Brazil, Leishmania infection is responsible for many cases of Leishmaniases, including recent reports in urban regions. Despite their sensitivity, traditional serological and parasitological methods for detecting Leishmaniases have proven inadequate for species discrimination. This study aimed to identify Leishmania species in biological samples by a fast methodology, avoiding “in vitro” cultivation. Knowledge of the Leishmania species is an important tool in regions where both New World visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are prevalent. As these new foci appear in areas not traditionally endemic for VL, the main problem is to distinguish between true autochthonous infections and infections acquired in other well-known endemic areas. Since, domestic dogs are known to be the main VL and CL reservoir, they are regularly investigated in endemic areas to prevent, principally, severe and often fatal VL in humans. However, several infected dogs present no clinical signs or clinical signs similar to other canine diseases. Here, we evaluated the ability of PCR to diagnose VL and distinguish L. ( L.) chagasi from other Leishmania species in domestic dogs. Samples from 114 dogs from 30 cities (Sao Paulo, Brazil) were divided into two groups: 44 symptomatic and 70 asymptomatic. They were assayed by parasitological methods (culture and microscopic examination) and PCR to determine L. ( L.) chagasi, L. ( V.) braziliensis; and in some cases, Leishmania spp. Parasitological tests and PCR- L. chagasi were concordant in 105 samples (92%). VL was confirmed in 49 dogs, while 56 had negative results. Of the 114 samples, 9 had discordant results, but were further tested by PCR- Leishmania spp. with positive results. VL was also confirmed in 4 dogs having negative parasitological tests and positive PCR- L. chagasi. Consequently, this PCR was positive for 100% (53/49) of dogs with parasites detected in parasitological tests. Also, PCR demonstrated high specificity detecting 61 dogs negative for VL. Leishmania infection was negative in 56 dogs, and 5 with positive culture and PCR- Leishmania spp. had CL since they were positive in PCR- L. braziliensis. This study shows the importance of including PCR in diagnosis of Leishmaniases by differential diagnosis contributing to the surveillance and control of VL programs.