Abstract

While now recognized as an aid to predict repeat prostate biopsy outcome, the urinary PCA3 (prostate cancer gene 3) test has also been recently advocated to predict initial biopsy results. The objective is to evaluate the performance of the PCA3 test in predicting results of initial prostate biopsies and to determine whether its incorporation into specific nomograms reinforces its diagnostic value. A prospective study included 601 consecutive patients addressed for initial prostate biopsy. The PCA3 test was performed before ≥12-core initial prostate biopsy, along with standard risk factor assessment. Diagnostic performance of the PCA3 test was evaluated. The three available nomograms (Hansen’s and Chun’s nomograms, as well as the updated Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator; PCPT) were applied to the cohort, and their predictive accuracies were assessed in terms of biopsy outcome: the presence of any prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade prostate cancer (HGPCa). The PCA3 score provided significant predictive accuracy. While the PCPT risk calculator appeared less accurate; both Chun’s and Hansen’s nomograms provided good calibration and high net benefit on decision curve analyses. When applying nomogram-derived PCa probability thresholds ≤30%, ≤6% of HGPCa would have been missed, while avoiding up to 48% of unnecessary biopsies. The urinary PCA3 test and PCA3-incorporating nomograms can be considered as reliable tools to aid in the initial biopsy decision.

Highlights

  • The widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test proved to improve early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) [1]

  • Urine samples were obtained from 601 consecutive patients addressed for initial prostate biopsy and, 594 samples were informative for the prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) test (99%)

  • Positive biopsies were observed in 276 patients (46%), including 128 patients with high-grade prostate cancer (HGPCa) (Gleason score ≥ 7), i.e., 46% of all prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test proved to improve early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) [1]. Chun et al [20,21,22] Another is dedicated to patients scheduled for repeat biopsy [23], while the last one, very recently published by Hansen et al [14], has been developed for guiding the initial biopsy decision. Both Hansen’s and Chun’s nomograms proved to provide significant clinical benefit without missing a too important proportion of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPCa) [14,21]. We aimed to (1) evaluate the diagnostic performance of the urinary PCA3 test to predict the outcome of initial prostate biopsies; and (2) perform a head-to-head comparison of the three urinary PCA3-based nomograms currently available for initial or mixed biopsy patients

Characteristics of Our Validation Cohort
Diagnostic Performance of the Urinary PCA3 Test
Head-to-Head Comparisons of the 3 Available Urinary PCA3-Based Nomograms
Discussion
Patients and Study Design
Biochemical Assays and Nomograms
Prostate Biopsies
Statistics
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call