P-BN38 Patient Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy after a Diagnosis of Gall Bladder (GB) Polyp over 10 Years

Abstract

Abstract Background Gall Bladder (GB) polyps are elevations of the GB wall that project into the lumen. They are a rare incidental radiological finding with prevalence of 0.3% to 9.5%. Although the majority of these may be pseudopolyps correct follow up and management is essential as to ensure that true polyps, which may be malignant or have malignant potential, are not missed. We conducted a retrospective study assessing patient factors that may predispose to the finding of true polyps. Patient outcomes including histological findings as well as ongoing symptoms and further investigations or emergency attendances were also assessed. Methods Patients were identified for this retrospective ten year cohort study using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD 10) code K 82.8, other specified diseases of gall bladder. Patients with other diagnoses such as gall bladder dysfunction were excluded after review of electronic patient record (EPR) (Sunrise, Allscripts). EPR allowed for review of emergency attendances, clinic letters, investigations and histological results for those diagnosed with a gall bladder polyp. Analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel. Results 35% patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the average wait time for surgery was 19 months but only 11% of patients were found to have true GB polyps on histology. Other histological findings included chronic cholecystitis (96%), cholesterolsis (33%) and stones 35%. Only 12% of those booked straight to laparoscopic cholecystectomy re-presented post operatively compared to 37% of those operated on after a period of surveillance. Patients booked straight for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or diagnosed with polyps >10mm in size, were statistically more likely to have a true GB polyp (P < 0.05), however, gender, ethnicity, and whether an isolated polyp or multiple were diagnosed made no statistical difference to detection of a true polyp (P > 0.05). Conclusions From this series of patients true polyps are most likely to be identified if it is larger than 10mm at diagnosis and operated on straight away. 96% of all patients, however, displayed histological features of chronic cholecystitis. This suggests that proceeding to laparoscopic cholecystectomy straight from diagnosis of a GB polyp can be justified. Only 1patient in our cohort returned normal GB histology.. Following diagnosis of a GB polyp, the option of operation versus surveillance should be discussed wirth individual patients and decisions based on assessment of risks and benefits should be made. Further research will help identify those with a predisposition to high-risk true polyps.