Abstract

Nanospheres of lead (Pb) have recently been identified in zircon (ZrSiO4) with the potential to compromise the veracity of U-Pb age determinations. The key assumption that the determined age is robust against the effects of Pb mobility, as long as Pb is not lost from the zircon during subsequent geological events, is now in question. To determine the effect of nanosphere formation on age determination, and whether analysis of nanospheres can yield additional information about the timing of both zircon growth and nanosphere formation, zircons from the Napier Complex in Enderby Land, East Antarctica, were investigated by high-spatial resolution NanoSIMS (Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry) mapping. Conventional SIMS analyses with >µm resolution potentially mixes Pb from multiple nanospheres with the zircon host, yielding variable average values and therefore unreliable ages. NanoSIMS analyses were obtained of 207Pb/206Pb in nanospheres a few nanometres in diameter that were resolved from 207Pb/206Pb measurements in the zircon host. We demonstrate that analysis for 207Pb/206Pb in multiple individual Pb nanospheres, along with separate analysis of 207Pb/206Pb in the zircon host, can not only accurately yield the age of zircon crystallization, but also the time of nanosphere formation resulting from Pb mobilization during metamorphism. Model ages for both events can be derived that are correlated due to the limited range of possible solutions that can be satisfied by the measured 207Pb/206Pb ratios of nanospheres and zircon host. For the Napier Complex zircons, this yields a model age of ca 3110 Ma for zircon formation and a late Archean model age of 2610 Ma for the metamorphism that produced the nanospheres. The Nanosphere Model Age (NMA) method constrains both the crystallization age and age of the metamorphism to ~±135 Ma, a significant improvement on errors derived from counting statistics.

Highlights

  • Spectrometry) U-Pb geochronology of zircon (ZrSiO4) has become the most widely used method for dating rocks that have undergone complex or multiple thermal events

  • The migration of radiogenic Pb in zircon during metamorphism has been established by several techniques, including SIMS6,11–15, TEM10,16,17 and atom-probe tomography (APT)[18,19,20,21]

  • Isotope maps acquired by NanoSIMS mapping show that is Pb heterogeneously distributed, but there is an association of 27Al and 48Ti with some of Pb nanospheres (Fig. 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spectrometry) U-Pb geochronology of zircon (ZrSiO4) has become the most widely used method for dating rocks that have undergone complex or multiple thermal events. A transmission electron microscope (TEM) study of zircons from the granulite-facies Napier Complex in Enderby Land, east Antarctica[10], showed that Pb mobilization occurred during metamorphism, forming crystalline native Pb nanospheres typically 100 μm[2], with sufficient spatial resolution to analyze many individual nanospheres within that area, can directly yield both the zircon formation age and the timing of metamorphism that caused the Pb mobilization.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.