Abstract
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) have become a popular approach to bring about improved environmental behaviors. When such programs are launched in developing countries, an additional benefit is that they are said to improve incomes for the poor. In this chapter, we argue that PES schemes are not “market-based.” Indeed, they are not even “market-like.” The incentive properties said to be present in such programs are of doubtful efficacy. We suggest that PES schemes are instances of a new class of transaction—the inducing transaction—whose purpose is to make certain resource users the instruments of the desires of others. We relate the success of PES schemes to Veblenian habituation and Peircean habit breaking and habit taking to suggest that PES schemes face a daunting challenge if they are to bring about durable behavioral changes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
