Abstract

BackgroundNivolumab is approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patterns and predictors of progressive disease (PD) on nivolumab, and outcomes in such patients are lacking.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who received nivolumab at Cleveland Clinic (2015–2017) was performed. PD was defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or clinical progression as per treating physician. Univariate analyses (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were used to identify clinical and laboratory markers as potential predictors of progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsNinety patients with mean age of 65, 74% men, and 83% good or intermediate International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group were included. Median number of prior systemic treatments was 2 (range, 1–6). Median overall survival (OS) and PFS were 15.8 and 4.4 months, respectively. Fifty-seven patients (63%) had PD and 44% of patients with radiographic PD had new organ sites of metastases with brain (8/23, 35%) being the most common. Twelve patients received treatment beyond progression (TBP), and among 6 patients with available data, 3 (50%) had any tumor shrinkage (2 pts. with 17% shrinkage, one pt. with 29% shrinkage). Of 57 patients with PD, 28 patients (49%) were able to initiate subsequent treatment, mainly with axitinib and cabozantinib, while 40% of patients were transitioned to hospice after PD. In MVA, a higher baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05–3.29; p = 0.033) was associated with an increased risk of progression, whereas higher (> 0.1 k/uL) baseline eosinophil count was associated with a lower risk of progression (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30–0.98; p = 0.042).ConclusionBrain was the most common site of PD in patients treated with nivolumab, and only half of patients progressing on nivolumab were able to initiate subsequent treatment. The risk of PD increased with a higher baseline NLR and reduced with a higher baseline eosinophil count.

Highlights

  • Nivolumab is approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma

  • Renal cell carcinoma has been considered an immune-responsive tumor and immunotherapy with high dose IL-2 has been used in select patients leading to complete and durable responses in a subset of patients [4]

  • The treatment was well tolerated with 19% treatment related grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs) in nivolumab vs. 37% in everolimus patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nivolumab is approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The treatment of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has dramatically changed over the last decade with introduction of targeted agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) [1]. These agents have significantly improved outcomes, they rarely result in complete responses [2, 3]. The treatment was well tolerated with 19% treatment related grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs) in nivolumab vs 37% in everolimus patients Based on these data, nivolumab became the preferred standard of care treatment for metastatic RCC patients who have progressed on previous antiangiogenic therapy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call