Abstract

BackgroundAlthough equity in health care is theoretically a cornerstone in Western societies, several studies show that services do not always provide equitable care for immigrants. Differences in pharmaceutical consumption between immigrants and natives are explained by variances in predisposing factors, enabling factors and needs across populations, and can be used as a proxy of disparities in health care use. By comparing the relative differences in pharmacological use between natives and immigrants from the same four countries of origin living in Spain and Norway respectively, this article presents a new approach to the study of inequity in health care.MethodsAll purchased drug prescriptions classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system in Aragon (Spain) and Norway for a total of 5 million natives and nearly 100,000 immigrants for one calendar year were included in this cross-sectional study. Age and gender adjusted relative purchase rates for immigrants from Poland, China, Colombia and Morocco compared to native populations in each of the host countries were calculated. Direct standardisation was performed based on the 2009 population structure of the OECD countries.ResultsOverall, a significantly lower proportion of immigrants in Aragon (Spain) and Norway purchased pharmacological drugs compared to natives. Patterns of use across the different immigrant groups were consistent in both host countries, despite potential disparities between the Spanish and Norwegian health care systems. Immigrants from Morocco showed the highest drug use rates in relation to natives, especially for antidepressants, “pain killers” and drugs for peptic ulcer. Immigrants from China and Poland showed the lowest use rates, while Colombians where more similar to host countries.ConclusionsThe similarities found between the two European countries in relation to immigrants’ pharmaceutical use disregarding their host country emphasises the need to consider specific immigrant-related features when planning and providing healthcare services to this part of the population. These results somehow remove the focus on inequity as the main reason to explain differences in purchase between immigrants and natives.

Highlights

  • Equity in health care is theoretically a cornerstone in Western societies, several studies show that services do not always provide equitable care for immigrants

  • We investigated whether patterns of use of pharmacological treatment for immigrants compared to natives were similar in two European countries: significantly lower proportion of immigrants in Aragon (Spain) and Norway

  • Compared to Spain, a lower purchase rate was observed in Norway for all main Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups except for genito-urinary system and sex hormones, and for the two less used groups: antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents and antiparasitic products

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Equity in health care is theoretically a cornerstone in Western societies, several studies show that services do not always provide equitable care for immigrants. Comparisons of drug consumption rates between immigrants and natives have seldom been conducted While most such studies have targeted specific drugs [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], to the best of our knowledge, only a few with a global pharmacological approach have been published [17,18,19,20]. These studies revealed a global pattern of lower consumption in immigrants compared with natives, with some exceptions [9, 10, 14]. Purchase and utilization are not necessarily equivalents, for pharmacoepidemiological studies purchased drugs are considered a good proxy of drug use [22] and both terms will be used interchangeably in this paper

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call