Abstract

Population-based data are sparse on utilization of prophylactic versus acute therapies for newly diagnosed migraine. We examined initial migraine treatment patterns and associated patient characteristics in Denmark. We used population-based health databases to assemble a nationwide cohort of adult migraine patients in 2005 to 2013. Migraine was defined as a first hospital diagnosis of migraine or a second redeemed outpatient prescription for triptans, ergots, pizotifen, or flunarizine. We classified the initial migraine treatment received after migraine onset as "no treatment," "acute only," "prophylactic only," and "both acute and prophylactic" and described distributions of sex, age, comorbidities, and comedications. Among 97431 migraine patients (78% women, median age of 41y [interquartile range of 32-50y]), the initial migraine treatments received were "acute only" (88.2%), "prophylactic only" (1.9%), and "both acute and prophylactic" (5.2%) whereas 4.6% had no record of treatment. Initiators of prophylactic treatment-with or without acute treatment-were less likely than initiators of acute treatment to be women (71% and 77% versus 79%), were older (median ages: 45 and 44y versus 41y), and had more comorbidities (including hypertension [31% and 24% versus 7%] and diabetes [6% and 5% versus 3%]). Nonpersistence with initial prophylactic treatment was common: within the first year, 35% of initiators stopped therapy fully, 50% stopped and restarted, and 15% switched drugs. For 88% of patients with incident migraine, the initial migraine treatment was acute treatment only. Use of prophylactic medication as initial treatment was low and correlated with higher age and comorbidity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.