Abstract
The aims of this study were to observe trends in testing for HIV between 2004 and 2007 in one London, UK, hospital and to observe the seroprevalence of HIV within subgroups. Tests were grouped according to source and reason for testing. A total of 58,720 tests were considered (HIV-1 seroprevalence 0.9%). The majority (75.4%) of tests were performed as part of routine and opt-out protocols including antenatal and genitourinary (GU) screening. Among people specifically seeking HIV testing, the HIV seroprevalence was 3.5%. Medical specialties performed fewer tests but a high HIV seroprevalence was observed, including infectious disease (seroprevalence 4.4%) and other medical specialties (seroprevalence 3.4%). A small number of specialties performed few HIV tests. HIV testing was cost-effective in virtually all settings. This study suggests that more HIV tests could be performed, for example, in acute medicine, and training might increase the number of tests offered in some settings. The most effective way of increasing testing appears to be opt-out testing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
