Abstract

Background: Variations in blood glucose levels over a given time interval is termed as glycemic variability (GV). Higher GV is associated with higher diabetes-related complications. The current study was done with the aim of detecting the sensitivity of various GV indices among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus of different glycemic control status. Methods: We performed a longitudinal study among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were participating in a two-week diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. Participants were categorized by their HbA1c as poor (≥8%), acceptable (7%–8%), and optimal control (<7%). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors recorded interstitial glucose every 15 min from day 1. The evaluated GV measures include standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA), mean of daily difference for inter-day variation (MODD), high blood glucose index (HBGI), and low blood glucose index (LBGI). Results: A total of 41 study participants with 46347 CGM values were available for analysis. Of 41 participants, 20 (48.7%) were in the poor, 10 (24.3%) in the acceptable, and 11 (26.8%) in the optimal control group. The GV indices (SD; CV; MODD; MAGE; CONGA; HBGI) of poorly controlled (77.43; 38.02; 45.82; 216.63; 14.10; 16.62) were higher than acceptable (50.02; 39.32; 30.79; 138.01; 8.87; 5.56) and optimal (34.15; 29.46; 24.56; 126.15; 8.67; 3.13) control group. Glycemic variability was reduced in the poorly and acceptably controlled groups by the end of the 2-week period. There was a rise in LBGI in the optimally controlled group, indicating pitfalls of tight glycemic control. Conclusion: Indices of glycemic variability are useful complements, and changes in it can be demonstrated within short periods.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is rising, with 1 in 11 adults worldwide affected, and more than 90% being type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1]

  • We designed a longitudinal study of two-week duration to understand glycemic variability amongst patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Of the 41 participants included in the analysis, 20 (48.7%) had poor glycemic control, (24.3%) had acceptable control, and (26.8%) had optimal glycemic control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is rising, with 1 in 11 adults worldwide affected, and more than 90% being type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1]. Achieving optimal glycemic control is necessary to prevent diabetes-related complications [2] and various pharmacologic and non-pharmacological interventions are essential components of diabetes care [3]. Studies show that about half of all patients with advanced T2DM fail to achieve glycemic control, largely due to post-prandial hyperglycemia [4]. Fluctuations in blood glucose levels over a given interval of time is referred to as glycemic variability. Variations in blood glucose levels over a given time interval is termed as glycemic variability (GV). The current study was done with the aim of detecting the sensitivity of various GV indices among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus of different glycemic control status. Methods: We performed a longitudinal study among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were participating in a two-week diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. Results: A total of 41 study participants with 46347 CGM values were available for analysis

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.