Abstract
The recent claim1 of an approximate 26-Myr periodicity in the pattern of mass species extinction over the past 250 Myr has already stimulated much astrophysical speculation and debate on causal mechanisms2–13. However, as shown here, the evidence for that claim is strongly contingent on arbitrary decisions concerning the absolute dating of stratigraphical boundaries14, the culling of the database and the definition of what is mass extinction as opposed to background extinction. This evidence becomes insufficient under other plausible geological timescales and other acceptable definitions of mass extinction. Analysis of the nonculled database shows that the reliability of identification of mass extinctions and their timing is at present extremely limited. It also suggests that the apparent periodicity of mass extinctions results from stochastic processes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
