Patterns of endogenous amino acid release from slices of rat and guinea-pig olfactory cortex

Abstract

A study has been made of the effects of depolarizing stimuli on the release of endogenous amino acid neurotransmitter candidates (aspartate, glutamate, GABA and taurine) from in vitro preparations of rat and guinea pig olfactory cortex. Exposure of small cubes of olfactory cortex tissue from either species to potassium chloride (50 mM) was accompanied by a calcium-dependent release of aspartate, glutamate and GABA. A similar release pattern was evoked by protoveratrine A (100 muM) although the release was largely calcium-independent. Neither agent led to increased release of taurine. Electrical stimulation of the excitatory input (lateral olfactory tract) of freshly prepared, synaptically intact olfactory cortex slices of both species induced significant release of aspartate and GABA from the uncut pial surface and of aspartate, GABA and glutamate from the cut surface. Evoked taurine release occurred from both surfaces of rat olfactory cortex slices but no release was detected from guinea pig olfactory cortex slices. These patterns of release were unaffected by changes in stimulus frequency and were mimicked by protoveratrine A (100 muM) applied to one or other surface. Preincubation of slices from rats for 2 led to loss of tissue amino acids and to changes in their release patterns; the presence of glutamine (5 mM) during preincubation prevented the loss of amino acids but did not alter their pattern of release. Because of the close similarities between both the electrophysiological properties and the patterns of amino acid release it is concluded that there is probably an identity of amino acid neurotransmitters (aspartate, glutamate and GABA) in rat and guinea pig olfactory cortex. The role of taurine in the rat olfactory cortex is unknown but would seem unlikely to be that of a neurotransmitter. The results are discussed: (i) in terms of the cellular origins of the released amino acids; and (ii) wit respect to apparent experimental discrepancies which have appeared in the literature.