Abstract

Background The breast cancer chemotherapy leads to diverse aspects of noxious or unintended adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that cause the relative dose intensity (RDI) reduced to below optimal (i.e., if the percentage of actual dose received per unit time divided by planned dose per unit time is less than 85%). Hence, this prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate chemotherapy-induced ADRs and their impact on relative dose intensity among women with breast cancer in Ethiopia. Methods The study was conducted with a cohort of 146 patients from January 1 to September 30, 2017, Gregorian Calendar (GC) at the only nationwide oncology center, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The ADRs of the chemotherapy were collected using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.03). The patients were personally interviewed for subjective toxicities, and laboratory results and supportive measures were recorded at each cycle. SPSS version 22 was used for analysis. Results Grade 3 neutropenia (23 (15.8%)) was the most frequently reported ADR among grade 3 hematological toxicity on cycle 4. However, overall grade fatigue (136 (93.2%)) and grade 3 nausea (31 (21.2%)) were the most frequently reported nonhematological toxicities on cycle 1. The majority of ADRs were reported during the first four cycles except for peripheral neuropathy. Oral antibiotics and G-CSF use (17 (11.6%)) and treatment delay (31 (21.2%)) were frequently reported on cycle 3. Overall, 61 (41.8%) and 42 (28.8%) of study participants experienced dose delay and used G-CSF, respectively, at least once during their enrollment. Of the 933 interventions observed, 95 (10%) cycles were delayed due to toxicities in which neutropenia attributed to the delay of 89 cycles. Forty-four (30.1%) of the patients received overall RDI < 85%. Pretreatment hematological counts were significant predictors (P < 0.05) for the incidence of first cycle hematological toxicities such as neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia and nonhematological toxicities like vomiting. Conclusion Ethiopian women with breast cancer on anthracycline-based AC and AC-T chemotherapy predominantly experienced grade 1 to 3 hematological and nonhematological ADRs, particularly during the first four cycles. Neutropenia was the only toxicity that led to RDI < 85%. Thus, enhancing the utilization of G-CSF and other supportive measures will improve RDI to above 85%.

Highlights

  • Treatment of breast cancer by chemotherapy significantly increases disease-free survival (DFS) [1, 2] and overall survival (OS) [2]

  • Neutropenia was the only toxicity that led to relative dose intensity (RDI) < 85%. us, enhancing the utilization of G-colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and other supportive measures will improve RDI to above 85%

  • Overall Grade Toxicity Profile, the Pattern of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) Use, and Treatment Delay at Each Cycle of Chemotherapy among the Study Participants. e highest frequencies of hematological toxicities were recorded at 4th cycles of chemotherapy, including overall grade leucopenia (68 (46.6%)), 3.3. e Pattern of Cumulative G-CSF Use, Dose Delay, and Toxicities Related to Dose Delay

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Treatment of breast cancer by chemotherapy significantly increases disease-free survival (DFS) [1, 2] and overall survival (OS) [2]. In addition to damaging cancer cells, it damages healthy cells which leads to diverse aspects of noxious and unintended reactions called adverse drug reactions (ADRs) [3, 4]. Most of the common and severe types of chemotherapy ADRs have been reported from clinical trials in which those. A large number of individuals (i.e., >86%) undergoing chemotherapy in the United State of America (USA) and Australia reported at least one ADR during their cancer treatment [3, 7]. Most of the chemotherapy-related ADRs affect a diverse aspect of patient’s quality of life [7] and further impair optimum chemotherapy delivery/relative dose intensity (RDI) [8] (i.e., the amount of drug administered per unit time expressed as a percentage of the planned dose) [9]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.