Abstract

We investigated diel habitat use of fish covering the littoral and pelagic zones of the Řimov Reservoir (Czech Republic) and analyzed the influence of predator presence and of shifting feeding habitats in all dominant species and age groups. Our sampling revealed distinctive diel changes of fish distribution in the reservoir, which were age- and species-dependent. The overall abundance of subadult fish in littoral habitats was significantly higher at night than during the daytime. Subadults were almost absent in pelagic habitat during the day and their presence increased during the night, although densities were smaller than in the littoral. Adults preferred the pelagic zone during the day and partly migrated to the littoral at night. Potential fish predators were most likely responsible for small fish avoidance of the littoral and pelagic zones during day. Higher availability of food in the littoral was the most important driver of the high occurrence of subadults at night. Day preference of pelagic zone by adults is most likely caused by higher profitability of this habitat in comparison with littoral. The reasons for night inshore migration of adults are not obvious, but the homogenization of their distribution or resting in the littoral could explain such behavior.

Highlights

  • We investigated diel habitat use of fish covering the littoral and pelagic zones of the R ́ımov Reservoir (Czech Republic) and analyzed the influence of predator presence and of shifting feeding habitats in all dominant species and age groups

  • The unstructured beach habitat was mostly occupied at night (Fig. 2)

  • Night densities were significantly higher for all groups of bream and roach as well as large bleak, small perch, pikeperch and ruffe, and the total average density per haul (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigated diel habitat use of fish covering the littoral and pelagic zones of the R ́ımov Reservoir (Czech Republic) and analyzed the influence of predator presence and of shifting feeding habitats in all dominant species and age groups. The predator–prey interaction is light-dependent such that upon a decrease in light intensity predator-avoidance effect of structures to predation risk is reduced (Cerri, 1983) and small fish could use habitats richer in food (mostly zooplankton) in the pelagic zone [often referred to as night offshore migration (NOM); Bohl, 1980; Romare et al, 2003; Gliwicz et al, 2006]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call